User talk:24.47.72.125

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Zeldin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

You are completely wrong with this. Those edits bring the article back to content neutrality instead of showing an inherent bias over a disputed fact. Period. Referencing VOX (which is basically Democrat toilet paper pseudo journalism) is a complete and utter joke. Whether you leftists like it or not (and I can tell from your screen name that you slant left), there was a legitimate dispute over the election results. Slanting the article to suit your view of the events is dishonest. I left it factual, not biased toward one side or the other where the reader can make their own conclusion. 24.47.72.125 (talk) 18:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Zeldin. BlueboyLINY (talk) 22:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

This needs to go to dispute. You are wrong as a matter of both law and fact with this. What you think does not belong in any published article. Facts are facts. I have given you ample actual evidence of the fallacy of your nonsense opinion. You seek to ignore actual hearings in actual states and actual resolutions that puts your entire premise at issue.

But yeah, a Democrat. I expect nothing less. 24.47.72.125 (talk) 21:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---