User talk:24.244.23.75

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. El_C 05:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dont be ridiculous - this is not a speedy keep - the blp concerns are real, the people involved on that page are real. 24.244.23.75 (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also - there is no consensus - there is you reverting the edits with rollback. 24.244.23.75 (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 05:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to make a point, I'm trying to point out the real problems with the page that make it untenable for continued presence as a mainspace article. 24.244.23.75 (talk) 05:10, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

El_C @El C:

The speedy delete tag was inappropriate and WP:POINTy. You are free to go through the normal process and list it on articles for deletion when your block expires. El_C 05:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: It would have been much more polite to say "Use the regular delete process" instead of just rollbacking it and placing boilerplates on my talk page, then ignoring it before blocking me. 24.244.23.75 (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's evident you are familiar enough with Wikipedia for that to have been redundant. El_C 05:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.