User talk:17Drew/Archive 5

Reverse Copyright

Thanks Drew. --Naime Tulum 12:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Non-free images

I think it is good to discuss (at length if necessary) which non-free images are allowed in Wikipedia and which ones are not. Although sometimes it feels like I'm arguing with someone who is opposing for the sake of argument. I tried to address the issue of non-free images in my fair use help. I would appreciate your comments on this. – Ilse@ 12:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Just a message

Why do you have to justify what is your nationality. Be proud of whatever you are. Even if you are being insulted, don't pay attention. I thought you would'nt pay attention. But when you added that justification on your user page, i think you are taking it to heart. I am an Indian and the extent of racism i face, you have no idea of it. Luxurious.gaurav 15:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry; I didn't take it to heart. I found it funny that people think Puerto Ricans are Mexican. It's quite impressive how hard it is to confuse the two. 17Drew 20:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Redirects

By reverting my changes aren't you yourself in violation of changing links to redirects that aren't broken? There are many reasons for changing a redirect. As you can see, I did not change all of them. The ones I did, I had reasons for. I do a lot of work with disambiguation, double redirects, and broken redirects. Most of my changes were to prevent future problems. For example, one link was to MTV Video Music Award for Best Pop Video and was listed as [[Best Pop Video]]. Now, yes, this is a working redirect, however in the future it may not be. The person who first wrote this should have redirected in the first place since "Best Pop Video" is pretty vague and others beside MTV can award this same exact title. It should be pipelined to "Best Pop Video" because in the context of the article, the rest of the title is not necessary. (Also, the link that followed was Best Group Video pipelined in this manner and I was going for consistency). Another example, I changed [[Hot 100]] to [[Billboard Hot 100|Hot 100]] because that is what it is. The article had the Billboard part already linked to the magazine. I'll admit, I went a little overboard changing these, however, you changing them back is worse because you intentionally changed perfectly working link to a redirect. When you revert my redirects, you also reverted some other changes I made. With this explained, I hope you understand why I reverted your changes. -Rocket000 05:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'm not going to change things back again, but I stand by my changes. I mean why intentionally leave the links in a "good enough" condition and deal with it when it becomes a problem rather than being preventive. I could understand your issue with this if those were the only changes I made, but they weren't. I linked Bounty Killer because that is how the infoboxes are done. See the rest of the links there, they are linked in the article too. I know it's not really necessary, but it matches the majority of how the other song infoboxes are done and I think it looks better. You may have fixed some of the spaces but, not the extra whitespace in the infobox. This extra space (which varies every line for some reason) makes it a lot harder to read when editing. I know it doesn't affect the reader, but I was looking out for the editor. Sorry about reverting your change (pop music -> Pop music). I overlooked this. I didn't realized you added your own edit in the reversion. All you said in your summary was a partial reversion. (You are aware that this link was lowercase to begin with, I didn't capitalize it, I just switched it to the front). -Rocket000 06:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

More Information

I found out some more songs for the "Micellaneous Songs" section of Gwen Stefani Discography.

Source: [1]

GWEN STEFANI (not including solo albums)
All-Star Tribute : What's Going On?
Sting : Every Breath You Take
Duran Duran : Lonely Business (possible future track)
Bono : Sweetest Thing
Eve : Let Me Blow Ya Mind
Fishbone : Everybody Is A Star
Moby : Southside
Bush : Spacetravel
Poe: Rise and Shine
Prince : So Far, So Pleased/Waiting Room
Brian Setzer Orchestra : You're The Boss
Sublime : Saw Red
GameFace : Time after Time

Some songs must be repeated, but some are new. Luxurious.gaurav 10:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Just a note...

To say that I think Jimmjet89/Jimjet89/Jimjet9489 is back again under the account Jim9489. I won't perform any blocks though; I'll see if he continues his image-disruption first. Acalamari 21:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Legality

I picked your name as it was first on the list. If you check the wikipedia article on IP Address, you will find it is illegal to casually give out the IP address of other people in Europe as this is private information. I trust wikipedia will stop this illegal practise now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.9.39.91 (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Request

I feel the current picture of Gwen Stefani is quite odd. I know it gives a clear view of the front face, but the expression is not the one which (according to me) matches the wikipedia standards. Is there no better picture in which she has a happy or rather neutral expression. Luxurious.gaurav 15:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

And yes, what happened to What You Waiting For's race to appear on the main page? Luxurious.gaurav 15:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi, it is my personal request that can you give RIAA single certification[2] a look? The article is horribly incorrect. For Example, Hollaback Girl -7 times platinum and The Sweet Escape-9 times platinum, which is completely wrong. Thank You! Luxurious.gaurav 15:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Did you see this. [3] Luxurious.gaurav 08:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Whoops! That's something i didnt notice. Now i have to revert myself. Luxurious.gaurav 09:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I hope you must have seen this. [4] She is lookin awesome! Luxurious.gaurav 09:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

MAY You?

I have two other user pages that I would like to delete, which are User:Truko9308 and User:nosaints4life is it possible for you, as an administrator, to delete it?TrUcO9311 22:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Should We?...

Should we add "Southside" and "Can I have it Like That" and "Let Me Blow ya mind" to the music video section of Gwen Stefani Discography. I have the name of video director and source for all three songs. Luxurious.gaurav 06:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Halloween6cover.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Halloween6cover.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 06:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

• I added the above comment as a standard template for the image there, a link has been provided, but it looks like a link to the film cover, and not the poster in the image. Maybe we can upload the image at that link to fix that problem? Ejfetters 06:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

You Have to see this

This is the best thing ever. A parody of The Sweet Escape. [5] Luxurious.gaurav 06:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

How to come to know which song is Gwen Stefani's signature song? Luxurious.gaurav 07:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

And yes, congratulations on Hey Ya! coming on the main page.Luxurious.gaurav 14:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bedtimestoriesm.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bedtimestoriesm.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BritneySpears-Everytime.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BritneySpears-Everytime.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sims2ppcpftukeng jpg jpgcopy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sims2ppcpftukeng jpg jpgcopy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:82876781492.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:82876781492.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Gwen Stefani discography

Hey Drew, I noticed in the album section of the discography, you left out the peak chart positions. Unlike some discographies like Christina Aguilera discography, your one doesn't have the album peaks. I'm just curious to know why you decided to keep it out. Maybe it's better left in the album article? Oh and awesome job in bringing Hey Ya! to a featured article. I appreciate all the work you've done to a lot of articles here. Spellcast 16:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

User talk:24.181.115.50

LOL, I was about to respond to him/her when I read your message on his/her talk page. Thanks for taking the words out of my mouth! :) Extraordinary Machine 21:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Also...

Tasty!

Happy Birthday!

~*~*~ !!!! Happy Birthday 17Drew !!!! ~*~*~

Extraordinary Machine 21:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TheRamones.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheRamones.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Upgrade U.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Upgrade U.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Full video released

Now That You Got It full video. Here goes the link! [6] Luxurious.gaurav 10:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RockLobster.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RockLobster.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Signature Song

I think it has to be Hollaback Girl, because in many many articles i have seen that they say (for example) - "The Hollaback singer kick starts her world tour...". Even in one of the sources used in Gwen Stefani articles, the heading of the source is something like Hollaback. Even though The Sweet Escape (song) was far more successful than Hollaback Girl, the latter continues to be her signature song. I think the only way to figure out which song is her signature song, we have to browse through zillions of articles and exctract a bunch of them which say for example, things like "The Hollaback singer....". I don't think a source will ever mention about which song is her signature song. I will get the source and let you know. Luxurious.gaurav 10:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

You might find this a tiresome job, but can you please count the total number of shows of The Sweet Escape Tour, it's coming to 100, while it's written 98 in the box beside. Please check and do inform me if i am wrong/right. Thanks! Luxurious.gaurav 10:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

And yes, do you think Gwen Stefani must have visited her page? Luxurious.gaurav 16:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

There is a vandal changing Gwen Stefani's genre of albums and singles. I think this IP user needs to be block. Charmed36 16:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Rihanna

I have no way of knowing this image is from Getty Images but I have no reason not to believe you so you may go ahead and delete it. Best, --Kudret abi 05:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

From me to you...

		The Resilient Barnstar
		For taking personal attacks like a man, and for linking said attacks on your user page as an example of stupid people being stupid for the world to see. :) LaraLove 02:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Also, happy belated birthday! And shoot me an email if you get a chance. My email is linked on my user page. LaraLove 02:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

My Last Message

Before i go on my mega leave, may i know why the No Doubt template doesn't mention the singles like gwen stefani's template does. Thanks and good bye for now. Do reply, i will be waiting for the reply and i will see the reply the reply if possuble. Bye! Luxurious.gaurav 12:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Please don't bite the newbies

Flagging the article for deletion that Smithgiant completely rewrote over the last week since he or she joined (looks to me like September 10th), comes very close to violating the behavioral guideline of Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers.

It seems that it would be much better to work with Smithgiant to get the article into shape than flagging his or her hard work with a deletion tag. Better to have a substandard article out there for a bit than to ostracize and alienate someone who's trying to become a wikipedian.

Also, newbies often remove flags without realizing they need to comment. It doesn't appear that you let Smithgiant know that deleting your flag was inappropriate, or made any comments. Please work with the newbies, and encourage their work. Fredsmith2 02:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

University Information

Hi I´m a college student from Mexico. I´m up to write something about the MIT. What I´m looking to is people who can tell me about the Student life there, and in your case the support the MIT gives to foreign students. It would be great if you could tell me about those things.

Thank you

Echg07 02:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Echg07

List of one-time characters from The Simpsons‎

I noticed that you nominated the similar Futurama page for deletion, so I was wondering if you were going to come after List of one-time characters from The Simpsons‎. I just cleaned the page up and cut 90% of the cruft and added a lot of real world info. I think the page passes the WP:FICT guidelines. As well, many of the pages that redirect here were done so because of AFDs that the result was "redirect to List of one-time characters from The Simpsons‎". Several of the characters listed are major characters within the Simpsons universe, such as Frank Grimes, Hank Scorpio, Jacques and Leon Kompowsky. Major characters that don't have enough real world info to qualify for an individual page, but haven't appeared multiple times and thus don't belong on the recurring page. Anyway, thanks for the time, Scorpion⁰⁴²² 18:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Fall Out Boy logo

As an administrator knowledgeable in image use, can you please look at this and give your opinion on which is most appropriate or if neither is. I'm to the point that I don't care, I just want it right. Someone at WP:MUSTARD said they should both be deleted. I don't know. But I'd like your input there. Regards, LaraLove 14:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ocean Spray logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ocean Spray logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

L.A.M.B

I have almost tripled the article in size. So does it still need the request for expansion template. I am working on it, so i don't think the request should stay there. I am removing it for the time being. Luxurious.gaurav 10:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I will do anything to save these images, except the harajuku lovers image. So can you please tell me what all i have to do to do so. Expecting Co - operation. Than You! Luxurious.gaurav —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 04:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

I Don't Remember

Hello, Drew! Hope you are well. I was hoping that you'd look at "I Don't Remember" and give me your opinion on whether or not it should have been listed as a GA. I'd very much appreciate your input. Regards, LaraLove 21:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Brilliant, as always. LaraLove 03:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Have sent you an email re this. Orderinchaos 16:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

A token of appreciation

		The Special Barnstar
		My dear Drew, in appreciation for all the times you have quickly and generously responded to my requests for insight, I bestow upon you this tiny treasure. You are an impressive editor and a great asset to this project. It is an honor to work with you. Best regards, LaraLove 03:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Verify

Can you please check whether reference number 34 of Hollaback Girl is working or no. Thanks! Reply soon. Luxurious.gaurav 17:27, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Hella Good

GA on hold, check out the review here. Leave me a note when you're done, — Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 02:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've passed it...nice work :) Hey, if you get the chance, could you possibly complete the 2nd op request here. I didn't pass/fail it because I'm related to the project (WP:AUSMUS) too much, and it has been waiting a while. Thanks, Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 03:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Yo, Drew

Good luck on your test today. If you have some time after, I'd like your help with something. Working on a discography to take to FL and I'm confused about something. Anyway, hope to hear from ya, Lara❤Love 14:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Say You'll Be There

Espero que note importe que te escriba en español, lo que pasa es que me es mas facil comunicarme asi que en ingles. Primero que nada gracias por revisar tan rapido el articulo, cuando encontre el articulo no tenia ninguna referencia y le faltaban varias secciones, y me mate buscando todas las que pude (el chart de Belgica y de España me tomaron meses), es muy dificil encontrar referencias del 96, bueno las secciones a las que le faltan referencias ya estaban antes de que yo encontrara el articulo, ahora lo que nose es si debo borrar esas partes como lo del MTV Asia (es practicamente imposible encontar una referencia), tambien me gustaria que me explicaras que debo de agregar o quitar o en que debe mejorar. Bueno espero que me respondas en cuanto puedas no importa en español o ingles.

Gracias Frcm1988 06:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

my bad

I didn't click the link, and assumed it was the standard youtube crap, not something official, sorry about that.Sennen goroshi 06:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

actually, perhaps you can give me a little advice, I have just started checking the Recent changes page over the last couple of days, it's easy to see the obvious vandalism (replacing topics with blank pages, obscene language etc) and very blatant POV, but I was confused regarding copyright - if something is provided by the copyright owner ie. the music videos that i mistakenly removed from youtube, they are fine - if they are commercial music videos/TV/movies on youtube that were added by a regular user (not the copyright owner) should I remove them? tag them? contact the editor who places them there? also when it comes to images, someone mentioned that all flikr images were now public domain, and suitable for wikipedia, is that true? sorry for the questions, I just don't want to mess up again. thanks Sennen goroshi 07:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Dirrty

If you can see my edit summary, you'll know. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 07:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The single's US position doesn't reached top 40. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 07:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

See this one. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 07:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Your saying that PEJL is not credible enough to post comment? If not, then why do superiors doesn't bother with the comment to rebut it? BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 07:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Fergie Discography

She has released only one album, so should the discography be up for deletion? Luxurious.gaurav 09:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Award lists

I remember learning from you earlier this year that using colours in award lists (such as highlighting wins) is against NPOV. I came across a featured list, List of Crowded House awards, which does the exact opposite. Just thought it's worth bringing this to your attention and see what you think. Spellcast 03:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Hm I suppose it's fine because the loses are being just as "emphasised" as the wins. Anyway, thanks for clarifying that. Spellcast 03:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ShutUpAndDriveVideo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ShutUpAndDriveVideo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Help

I have changed my name, but when i sign, it still comes Luxurious.gaurav. How to get my new name when i sign. Pleae Help! Luxurious.gaurav 16:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Any reply??Luxurious.gaurav 06:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh well! If possible then can you tell me the procedure to change name. I would be so greatful! Thank you sooooo much!

And congrats on Hella Good going GA. Rock Steady can become a Featured topic only if Running is GA. Luxurious.gaurav 07:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your attention on L.A.M.B. My main aim for nominating the article was to get suggestions as no one replys on Peer Review. Luxurious.gaurav 07:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

And YEs! What about this. This is what i found about the cerits and producers of The Sweet Escape:-

• Producers: Ron Fair, Nellee Hooper ,Mark "Spike"Stent ,Tony Kanal ,The Neptunes ,Swizz Beatz,Sean Garrett ,Greg Collins,Giorgio Tuinfort
• Engineers: Kevin Mills ,Colin Mitchell ,Simon Gogerly, Andrew Coleman ,Brian Garten, Angelo Aponte, Andrew Alekel ,Bojan Dugich ,Jonathan Merritt ,Keith Gretlein, Julian Chan, Neil Kanal
• Contributers: Steve Berman ,Martin Kierszenbaum ,Robbie Snow ,Gretchen Anderson ,Kathy Angstadt, Thom Williams ,Chris Lopes , Stephanie Johnson, David Cohen ,Andrew Mains ,Ravid Yosef ,Dennis Dennehy ,Dyana Kass ,David Saslow ,Ryan O'Donnell ,Jurgen Grebner ,Scott Enright ,Tom Balla ,Missy Barone, Candace Berry , Brian Bray, Nino Cuccinello, Wendy Diplock, Jordan Glickson, Morgan Hartmann, Kerry Hickey, Neil Jacobson, Garnett March, Ginger Ramsey ,Crystal Riley, Brenda Romano, Tony Seyler ,Dave Tomberlin ,Vivian Tran

• Programming: Aidan Love ,Ewan Pearson, Aliaune "Akon" Thiam
• Keyboards: Pete Davis, Giorgio Tuinfort, Tony Kanal, Loren Dawson, Tim Rice-Oxley, Aliaune "Akon" Thiam
• Guitars: Martin L. Gore, Tony Love, Greg Collins, Richard Hawley, Matt Beck, Mark Ralph, Alex Dromgoole
• Art direction: Jolie Clemens
• Gardener Mastering: Brian "Big Bass"
• Background Vocals: Kingston James McGregor Rossdale, Sean Garrett, Talent Bootcamp Kids
• Trumpet: Stephen Bradley
• Saxophone: Angelo Moore
• Trombone and Baritone: Gabriel McNair

Source:-http://music.barnesandnoble.com/search/product.asp?z=y&ean=602517144118 Luxurious.gaurav 08:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

HOW MUCH TIME DOES IT TAKE USUALLY FOR AN ARTICLE TO GET GA REVIEW? Indianescence 04:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

That really gives me patience. L.A.M.B has been waiting for only 10 days. Can you suggest me a nice Fashion article so that i can follow it. And if it's a celebrity fashion article, then it's like cherry on the cake. I am working on a topic which i completely alien to me. Indianescence 04:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Whoa! If L.A.M.B passes GA, it would be the first fashion line to do so! Because of this reason, i have to do everything on my own. Gucci, Prada, Dolce and gabanna, Armani...none are GA. Indianescence 04:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

YOU HAVE TO SEE THIS http://www.hp.tabblo.com/gwen?jumpid=ex_r11400_ipg20%7Cen-us%7COLAS%7CGW%7CCons%7C334047%7C18572957%7C129854307%7C —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indianescence (talk • contribs) 04:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

How much do U know 'bout images?

Some snarky Britney fan uploaded a fake Blackout album cover image overtop of Image:Nocover.jpg. I grabbed an old copy of the image and put it back, but I'm not 100% sure I did it right... for example I kept the licensing there as a CD cover because I wasn't sure what to change it to, based on the choices I had in the drop-down menu. I tried to just do a revert but that didn't work. Can you take a quick look at it? I protected the image - I just wanted to get the correct .jpg uploaded again right away since it is on a bunch of articles. Please and thanks! - eo 21:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

hello drew

Hello, I have seen your photo, that young to go to a university, am deaf dumb Peruvian which I enter English today, I congratulate you by your intelligence and I hope that in the future you will obtain world-wide. a hug

--Csuarezllosa 02:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Blackout durations

Spears' Blackout song durations are sourced with the track listing website. Charmed36 01:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I haven't seen a source for songwriters, but producers yes. [7] There is another source, but I don't remember it. Charmed36 01:52, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

FL Main page proposal

You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination recently. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual content will resemble the current content at the featured content page. Such output would probably start at the bottom of the main page. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. Right now debate seems to be among support for the current selective democratic/consensus based proposal, a selective dictatorial approach like that used at WP:TFA or a non-selective first in line/calendar approach like that used at WP:POTD. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

You previously opposed the List of the Day Proposal due to formatting concerns. Could you please look at the following two proposed main page mockups and reconsider your vote:

Excerpted list format

Abbreviated text format —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 18:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposal

Was the deletion of peak positions in the infobox successful? Even if other users put that stuff, it doesn't appear anymore. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 04:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks Drew for saving me. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 23:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

By the way, I will keep on removing the chart position because its no use anymore in the infobox. If you want to stop me from doing it, feel free to drop a message on my talk page. Thanks. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 00:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Where We Land

You probably might like to look at the article again. Thanks. Do you have any more comments you may like to say that'll improve the page? RaNdOm26 10:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Huge help

I don't know what to do but someone has competely changed L.A.M.B without any discussion. He has edited it sooo much that i feel i am stuck in a web. I can't make out anything. Can you please compare my previous version and the new one and sort out the incorrect edits. THANK YOU! Indianescence 16:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Favour?

I won't be coming on Wikipedia till April. So it's my personal request, please look after L.A.M.B. Thanks. Indianescence 17:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Nathaniel Street-West: article has been edited by editors claiming to be associated with the subject

Hi. Thank you for pointing out several major errors associated with the Nathaniel Street-West Wikipedia page. I am quite new to Wikipedia as you more experienced editors can readily see. I can see that the article needs far more documenting to the proper sources and I am working on a reasonable system for doing so. I have read many Wikipedia biographies of musicians and where as some have a footnote for practically each and every sentence, many more are written in a looser format that lists sources but without pasting numbers and footnotes all over the place. This will take some time, however the material will be properly sourced. Do the tags have to be left in place? It only embarrasses the subject... On a more serious note, the messages that were left in association with the photograph uploads in this article in no way implies that the photographers who logged in under the "Penny Lane" editor claim to be (or are) associated with the subject. I can see how it would be confusing for several photographers to log on using the same editorial user name. I see the error now and from this point on there will be no more than one person (editor) logging on as PennyLane100. Unfortunately two of the photographers/artists who uploaded several image files (Image:American Way Cover Art.jpg; Image:Witness Cover 300px.jpg; Image:Nathaniel Street-West in 2006.jpg) by logging in under the PennyLane100 editor name identified themselves as being associated with Puffin Records. This is because I requested the images from Puffin Records and the employees misunderstood the ground rules for how to identify themselves and the legal status of the photographs. As the editor PennyLane100 I am not associated with the subject and neither are the photographers who logged in as "aliases" of PennyLane100 associated with the subject. I requested images of the subject from Puffin Records and the people who logged in as “aliases” and uploaded these images at my request misunderstood what to write. I am the sole editor of the initial text & page design (before other editor's recent corrections) and hold myself responsible for all errors. I am uploading all new photographs for this article and any photographs I request from Puffin Records I will ask to have sent to the Wikipedia Commons if at all possible. Our webmaster devised the plan to use one editor username for the whole page so that the photographers could simply log in as PennyLane100 and upload, and was confused by the immense amount of data ruling who may and may not claim a copyrighted image, and by the many different licensing regulations and this led to the mess. Nevertheless, I am taking all responsibility for this embarrassing debacle. There is no conspiracy here. The people who logged in appropriately (me) and inappropriately (those we asked to log in as a convenience) as Penny Lane100 are not in cahoots together in any diabolical way. My biggest concern is that I have embarrassed the artist, Nathaniel Street-West, by thinking of him having to suffer through the egregious and threatening warnings plastered across the top of his Wikipedia page. AT the very least, I am requesting that the "conflict of interest" notice be removed from the head of the page. I am also requesting that other editors refrain from accusing me of having some undue conflict of interest in relation to the subject. (By the way, who is the person in charge of removing these notices?) Again, thank you for your help! I hope this clears up the situation and I will be passing this on to the other editors who mentioned a possible conflict of interest. (Apologies for the long message!) PennyLane100 02:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about the reference

Sorry, ill make it work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BatterBean (talk • contribs) 01:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CSI Miami box cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CSI Miami box cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ShutUpAndDriveVideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ShutUpAndDriveVideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RoxyMusicJerryHall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RoxyMusicJerryHall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

bob gittens

Hi there I will like to create an article on Bob Gittens a Trinidad and Tobago radio personality but it was deleted from the wikipedia please tell me the reason and how can i post that article again so it will be approved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki10 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RunningVideo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:RunningVideo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dualla Season 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dualla Season 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Spears' image removal

I browsed the page history and if found out that you Drew removed the image with reason per edit summary. Yes i understand because its copyrighted and its replaceable however, this image which is currently being used in the page is also copyrighted and the same type of image which is screeshot. What wrong? --βritandβeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 10:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok. I understand your point. It doesn't met NFCC Policy#8. --βritand&βeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 07:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Please add these things

The articles Wind It Up and Hollaback Girl don't have anything in their chart section which talks about their performance on United World Chart. I have the points they collected on the chart, but if their performance is not mentioned, points won't make any sense. Indianescence 12:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Oi To The World

Hey, with Oi To The World by No Doubt, there was a video made and I found the album it came from. Amazon. Should this be a single for No Doubt and should there be an article made for it? BatterBean 09:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Please note Drew

The following things are discovered:-
1. The peak of "Can i have it like that" is confusing. The Paragraph about chart performance says that it peaked at number 49 on the Hot 100, while the chart table says it peaked at number 48. Can you please correct that.

2. Reference number 10 of Luxurious is empty. Can you look in to the matter?

3. Can you add the United World Chart performance of the songs Wind it Up and Hollaback Girl in their chart performance para. I feel it's very necessary.

Thank you! Indianescence 09:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Luxury chords!

Hello there, Drew! I'm glad to help you out there. I didn't know the song and it quite frightened me through all that tension it builds over and over again. Well, it seems like you have the wrong chords. I've listened to the song carefully and sorted out the whole progression. There are only five chord moves which repeat throughout the song with no variation - the bassline witnesses it.

First of all, the song's in a major tone, and not minor, as a typical Andalusian cadence would demand. The chords are as following: F | E_7b9 | Am | Gm-C , where each "|" signifies a new bar; the Gm-C run fits in only one measure (each lasts half a measure, say a half note in typical 4/4). If you don't feel enlightened with why is it major, try this one: play the chords, omitting the "E_7b9" chord, and it'll surely sound major to you. That avoided chord is the only queer sonority in the progressionl; the rest are quite everyday. However, it is it who produces the whole tension in the song, so the other "trivial" chord moves just weigh it down.

The tonic in this progression is the F chord, so shall's write it down as a "I". Now, the E_7b9 would have little to do with the rest of the song (at least, through the tonal point of view) if there wasn't an Am coming after it. The Am chord is the third step in F major, that we'll call a "iii". Therefore, the E_7b9 is a secondary dominant to Am, just that it features not only a seventh, but also a ninth. It is a minor ninth because it fits better with the following minor chord (a major ninth would've sounded a little modal or jazzy). So, the E_7b9-Am move writes as a "V₉/iii - iii".

Following, just a plain "ii - V" (Gm-C), which resolves back to I (F). Sometimes, between "iii" and "ii", a silent "$\flat$iii" can be heard (especially the bass, which goes: A-Ab-G). That's a very common move, often automatic to many listeners and musicians. So, the whole progression looks like this:

• jazz-pop notation: F | E_7b9 | Am(-Abm) | Gm-C (and back to F, and so on)
• tonal harmony: I - V₉/iii - iii (- $\flat$iii) - ii - V (and back to I)

That's a hundred miles away from Andalusian cadences! Although it does start with "I" and some kind of "VII" (i.e., the "V₉/iii" chord), and it ends in "V", it is major and also employs modal steps, such as "ii" and "iii"! The Andalusian dramatism's is over :) However, there is still some significant tension out there, but it's more of a jazzy kind. Good luck with the article! If you have furher questions, don't be afraid to ask. (Impy4ever 13:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SowIntoYouVideo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SowIntoYouVideo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TDAT screenshot 4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TDAT screenshot 4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DiddyTellMe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DiddyTellMe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CarolinaPanthersAlt 2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CarolinaPanthersAlt 2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Die Hard Arcade.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Die Hard Arcade.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Die Hard Nakatomi Plaza.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Die Hard Nakatomi Plaza.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carter and Dakarai.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carter and Dakarai.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cv aos agb rgb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cv aos agb rgb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DrstrangeloveCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DrstrangeloveCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Salacious, unverified information

The little blurb you have added about Diana Ross exchanging oral sex for a recording contract is a lie and based on no evidence besides your imagination. It should be and has been deleted.76.170.35.75 15:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)