If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
In the event of vandalism from this IP address, this agency or facility's response team has requested that administrators consider a short duration soft block, and have stated that they will respond to reports sent to disa.columbus.ns.mbx.arin-registrations@mail.mil, which may lead to disciplinary measures being taken by the agency or facility's administration.
Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.163.0.42) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.
Hello, 138.163.0.42. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please ensure you are familiar with these guidelines before you edit any articles related to the United States military or government. Thank you - wolf 20:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 18:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Indiana worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --CyrusAndiron 14:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Cheeser1, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Duke53. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
this is a shared IP for millions of people. It sucks that there are some idiots, but no need to punish everybody on behalf of them.
Decline reason:
That's why the block is anon-only, to allow people to continue editing. If you do not yet have an account, please check your block message to see how to obtain one. — Yamla (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Then just do away with anon editing. Wikipedia = Fail
Hi, you seem to be doing a lot of work on Rambo - have you considered creating an account? It only takes a few seconds. BlinkingBlimey (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jackal, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jackal was changed by 138.163.0.42(u)(t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-02T17:37:53+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Diana, Princess of Wales, you will be blocked from editing. Viewfinder (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Security clearance, you will be blocked from editing. If you continue to vandalize using US Marine Corps computer, this whole IP range will be blocked from editing.Cahk (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naomi Oreskes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ad hoc has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Orphan (film). However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 08:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Caps lock, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Caps lock was changed by 138.163.0.42(u)(t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-20T13:04:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Oscar Wilde has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 04:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Phrazes for the Young. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 04:48, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Amphibious Construction Battalion One, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page San Diego. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Stroppolo (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Eastside High School (Lancaster, California) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of United States Navy ratings, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chief Petty Officer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 19:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chief petty officer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Luke(Talk) 23:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Business casual. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Amp71 (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Moosehadley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Donovan McNabb, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Moosehadley 06:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Donovan McNabb. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Moosehadley 06:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop changing Nvidia to NVIDIA, we don't follow company trademark styling. See WP:ALLCAPS. Nearly all your edits today have violated the guidelines of our Manual of Style and have therefore been reverted. I suggest you stop making such changes until you've read and understood our style guide. To continue with what you are doing is wasting both your own time and mine. Yworo (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now you are removing templates (those things in curly braces) that you don't understand. STOP IT. Yworo (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Titan (supercomputer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing C-40 Clipper with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808talkcontribs 20:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Scetoaux. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Zipper that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, — scetoaux(T|C) 05:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zipper with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — scetoaux(T|C) 05:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Increasingly, OCS-IS candidates are non-commissioned officers in whom the Army has invested years of training and education. I do not understand why the OCS-IS candidates are non commissioned and why are they majority?? I expected a better academic performance.
Hello, I'm Super48paul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lauren Conrad because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Funny - but inappropriate for Wikipedia.Super48paul (talk) 22:14, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to VFA-192 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Jonathanfu. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Snap-on, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jonathanfu (talk) 13:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thomas Tucker, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VelellaVelella Talk 19:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Turgan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to HSC-21, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TurganTalk 22:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Elder Scrolls Online. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 18:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Commander, Naval Air Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Dingo , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Edward Snowden, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, the word traitor is 16 times mentioned in the ES article, that should cover this opinion. prokaryotes (talk) 22:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Silento with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Silento, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Bouyon music, will not be tolerated. Vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, although your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Long-term disruption, block evasion. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Caribbean music vandal.Binksternet (talk) 06:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The data sheet here says "2500 kilowatts". That's 2500 x 1000 watts = 2,500,000 watts, or 2.5 megawatts. Please be a little more careful before declaring long-standing content as "ludicrous". Jeh (talk) 17:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jane Wyman— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell(talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pravda— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (talk) 23:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeanine Pirro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 00:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your recent edit to El Toro High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Charles Momsen, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Everedux(talk) 21:12, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cokie Roberts, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cokie Roberts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Naval Air Station Point Mugu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
To edit, please log in.
Hello, 138.163.0.42. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing C-40 Clipper with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 20:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Muskrat with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 17:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Silento with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
