User talk:136.181.195.241

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to The Free Beer and Hot Wings Show, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Free Beer and Hot Wings Show with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Puffin. I noticed that in one of your feedback submissions such as the feedback you left on the Nordic combined at the 2014 Winter Olympics article using the Article Feedback Tool, you asked a question about the content of the article. Unfortunately I can't answer the question you left, but the volunteers at the Reference desk may be able to help. I also wanted to let you know that the Article Feedback Tool should be used to suggest constructive changes to the article according to the guidelines for posting helpful feedback. Thank you. Puffin Let's talk! 15:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Table shuffleboard because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Virgil Smith, Jr.. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  15:05, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 2015 New Orleans Saints season— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015 New Orleans Saints season with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dcirovic (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


trying to point ouit wrong information, but I guess you guys are ok with someone else vandalizing the Saints page, I for one am not

May 2016[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 2015 New Orleans Saints season with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. –Qpalzmmzlapq T C 00:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


check the page, the entire draft list is wrong, glad you guys let someone else vandalize the page but think that someone who is trying to fix it is in the wrong

well I tried, guess you guys are the ones looking bad, having a professional organizations page display incorrect data, shame on you

Vandalism warning[edit]

Greetings. I have reverted your obvious vandalism edit at the George Armstrong Custer page. Vandals are subject to warnings, of which I see you have a number, and to eventual blocks of their abilities to edit. Why not see if you can improve an article you are interested in? You might just find that adding to the world's free online encyclopedia, instead of disrupting it, is much more rewarding. In hopes you will join us, Jusdafax 07:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Terrelle Pryor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oaks Correctional Facility, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Grand Rapids Community College added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Trains2050. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alma, Michigan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Trains2050 (talk) 12:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Raw animal food diets—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Common Era, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please do not introduce unrelated material to an article. ItsCheck (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Common Era. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Shaws username . talk . 21:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bride, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. A bridesman is a seperate thing, bridesmaids are referenced later in the same sentence Shaws username . talk . 21:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.