User talk:130.65.109.103

mlk stands for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Library, third floor

Your edit to Popularity

Your recent edit to Popularity (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Economy of South Africa on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Cbrown1023 23:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

July 2007

Dear 130.65.109.103, hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Leopard Seal. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content without a good reason, (which should be specified in the edit summary.) Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia! If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- ^Ariel♥Gold 02:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sean Combs, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JForget 01:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dennis Lehane, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dennis Lehane was changed by 130.65.109.103 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-07-13T22:04:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

The website you use as a source for your edit on Dennis Lehane is not a reliable source by Wikipedia's standards. As a result, this negative information violates the neutral point of view policy and has been removed. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Dennis Lehane. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. JNW (talk) 02:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Sara Paretsky, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Someguy1221 (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Sara Paretsky. Epbr123 (talk) 21:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Avi (talk) 21:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

---

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), anonymous editing from your school, library or institution's IP address may be disabled. You continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address is probably also disabled.

If editing is required for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.

Thank you. — Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 04:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Juggalo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abce2 (talk) 01:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sciortino Crime Family has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. 10metreh (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Tracy Chapman (album), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Falcon8765 (talk) 16:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Girl You Know It's True has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Blue Rasberry 03:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tracy Chapman discography, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Bryan Adams worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Tiderolls 22:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Your recent edit to the page Sade discography appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 20:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2011

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 08:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Whitney (album)

Hi! Please don't post comments, on the article. Use the talk page instead. Also, I don't know what you're talking about: You need update this Just the Lonely Talking. Original mex 7.17 and Your Still My Man 6.46 on You Tube and unrelease from session 61 songs no produce. Sales in RIAA 16xplatinum erase your problem inaccurate. Cease egotistical allow additional information.? Novice7 (talk) 05:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Stronger Than Pride. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Christopher Hitchens has been reverted.
Your edit here to Christopher Hitchens was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnQGyHcDoU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Hitchens may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jimmy Buffett may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• jimmy-buffett/ |title=Jimmy Buffett |work=[[Forbes]] }year=2015 |accessdate=April 28, 2016 }}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Net worth

Hello. I noticed you have been adding the net worths of famous people to articles. While efforts to make biographical articles more complete are welcome, an individual's net worth may not be relevant for every article. For example, net worth might be an important detail about a musical artist, but there is no reason to believe that the net worth of a noncommercial public figure like Richard Dawkins is notable. In addition, I don't think CelebrityNetWorth is a WP:reliable source. It might be a good idea to pause before adding net worths en masse to articles and only add them if they are relevant to the topic and can be backed up by at least one other source. If you have any questions, just drop a note on my talk page. Cheers, Intelligentsium 02:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 130.65.109.103. You have new messages at Intelligentsium's talk page.
Message added 03:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Intelligentsium 03:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest editing

Hi,

I responded to your comment on the talk page. However, I noticed that the company CelebrityNetWorth is headquartered in California where you live and seems to have a number of employees near your geographic area. Forgive me for being nosy, but it appears many or most of their employees are college students and you are editing from a college in California. If you are associated with the company in any way, please be informed of Wikipedia's conflict of interest editing policy. In brief, conflicts of interest must be disclosed, and Wikipedia strongly discourages editors editing articles relating to topics to which they have a connection. If I am mistaken, I apologize, feel free to disregard this message. Intelligentsium 02:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

I have no relationship with CNW. The way that I found out about the website a few days ago was while typing into Google the search phrase "Christopher Hitchens n" and the first search phrase offered by the Google-supplied popdown was "Christopher Hitchens net worth". The search results returned started with a Google-special entry about net worth that pointed to CNW and the next result was to http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/authors/christopher-hitchens-net-worth/ . In other words, Google thinks it is pretty notable. I was intrigued and proceeded from there.--130.65.109.103 (talk) 02:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, just checking. The Google entries are scraped from Wikipedia. In addition, Google hits are not given any weight when determining notability. Please stop adding net worths cited to CNW until the matter of whether CNW is a reliable source is resolved. You are welcome to comment at the discussion on WP:RSN. Thanks, Intelligentsium 03:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Please explain this edit. Intelligentsium 03:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Just trying to speak Wikipedia's language. CNW is different than Wikipedia. We just need to communicate and maybe introspect a little.--130.65.109.103 (talk) 03:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, CNW is different from Wikipedia, but neither CNW nor Wikipedia is a reliable source. I don't follow your logic as to how saying CNW has not had an Essjay affair helps your case. However, on Wikipedia the source of information must be transparent and shown for all editors to verify, which is not the case on CNW. Another editor has weighed in on WP:RSN, and several others have reverted the addition of CNW to pages on the grounds that it is not reliable. The consensus appears to be that this is not a reliable source. If you have any additional comment, you are welcome to provide it, but please do not add citations to the site anymore as they will be reverted. Intelligentsium 13:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vivo (Coda album) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

Hello, 130.65.109.103. You have new messages at WP:RSN.
Message added 23:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Let's try to keep all the discussion in one place. Intelligentsium 23:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop

Hi, I just came across your most recent edits. While we did reach a consensus that Forbes is a better source for net worth than CelebrityNetWorth and inclusion can be considered if the net worth figure is provided by a reliable source, I don't believe there was ever a consensus to mass add net worths to articles. Your edit summaries such as "Nobody should feel sorry for the subject because of his ethnicity. Nobody. He can buy his happiness all he wants", "Out this guy. He has sold his soul to the almighty dollar", "Out this "philanthropist". He is making tens of millions but how much of that goes to him being such a nice guy? Huh?, among others, show you are using Wikipedia as a soapbox to "out" philanthropists you believe are not doing enough. Please stop and initiate a discussion as to whether every article with a net worth available should have a net worth added; otherwise the next stop is ANI. Intelligentsium 21:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Where is your sense of humor? I was just kidding. I do not give a rat's ass about any of these rich people. Whether they live or die painfully or otherwise. I just know what upsets you control freaks. Lighten up! Go have a walk and a latte and maybe a nice bath. Breathe. There now. Isn't that better?--130.65.109.103 (talk) 21:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm not upset; this topic doesn't affect me in any way. However, I am concerned that you're making mass additions to pages without consensus. Your use of disruptive edit summaries is not funny, nor is the subtle POINTedness of adding net worths to the Philanthropy sections of biographies in order to discredit them. Intelligentsium 21:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Well, if somebody wants to improve the article by moving the sentences around, let them. This would all be so much simpler if many more of the infoboxes just had salary and net_worth as parameters. At the moment, I can only find them on Template:Infobox person and Template:Infobox peer. Put them on all infoboxes; that would be the mature approach. But each one has to be done by consensus, one-by-one. Brutal.--130.65.109.103 (talk) 22:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

While there is some consensus to include net worth in some circumstances, there is no precedent for adding salary or revenue/annual income. The infoboxes do not have those parameters simply for the reason that there is no consensus to include it systematically. Thank you for pausing your edits to discuss - I have initiated a discussion of when inclusion is appropriate at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#When_is_it_appropriate_to_include_net_worth_in_a_BLP. Intelligentsium 22:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Foo Fighters, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Have it your way, young man. This noticebox and your request for page protection strike me (and the administrators) as an over-reaction to a number that you simply, in your young years and chosen profession, do not like. Oh well. --130.65.109.103 (talk) 21:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to the page CelebrityNetWorth have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Intelligentsium 21:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

OK. I just found an interview of the guy anyway so it will be more reliable.--130.65.109.103 (talk) 21:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Human reproduction— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to A Mother's Right: The Elizabeth Morgan Story have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to A Mother's Right: The Elizabeth Morgan Story was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89GVqlLkJ7w) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Arizona, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 22:54, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rage Against the Machine. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm Interstatefive. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mutual assured destruction, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 00:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---