User talk:Векочел/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Mauricio Macri/GA2

Векочел, you opened your review over five weeks ago with the words Векочел, and haven't been back since. It seems likely that you forgot about it, hence this reminder.

Do you intend to begin reviewing this soon? If not, please let me know; I can arrange for the unused review page to be deleted and the nomination put back into the pool of unreviewed GANs with no loss in seniority. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, I will review this within the next week. Векочел (talk) 18:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Great! Thanks for the quick response. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

It looks like the nominator has stopped editing Wikipedia. Векочел (talk) 02:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Векочел, you still need to complete the review somehow. You could make a request at the Argentina WikiProject to see whether anyone would be willing to address the issues you'd inevitably raise during the course of a review, since this is an article on the president of that country, and if no one volunteers, close it then. Or you could preemptively close it now since your one request has not yet been answered and the nominator retired over six weeks ago. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. I know you're busy, sorry to bother. Can you take the time to copy editing for this article? I really need your help. Thanks you very much. Xecvws (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

barnstar

		El Jefe
		On behalf of myself, I extend congratulations on your selection to the ruling junta of Milhist and affirm my loyalty to it. Chetsford (talk) 01:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Chetsford. Векочел (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The Coordinator stars
		On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your election to the position of Coordinator, I take great pleasure in presenting you with the Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best luck in the coming year! Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the team! I'm glad to see you decided to run, and I'm looking forward to working with this coming year. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Yes TomStar81, I’m also looking forward to this year. I did not expect to be elected! Векочел (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Looking forward to work with you in the comming year. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm sure it will be an interesting year CPA-5. Векочел (talk) 17:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry I of England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis VI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize

Hello, Векочел- It looks like you are here to do good work and improve the encyclopedia, which I'm sure everyone appreciates. But this project is a collaboration, and when editors leave no edit summaries, it makes watching pages more tedious for the rest of the community. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
- The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 16:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Chetsford (talk) 03:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Mr X 🖋 13:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Editing Donald Trump

Please observe the page restrictions on Donald Trump. Ignoring the big yellow box can result in you being blocked from editing or being topic banned. The restrictions say:

The following discretionary sanctions apply to all people who edit this article:

You must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to this article.
If an edit you make is reverted you must discuss on the talk page and wait 24 hours before reinstating your edit.

You violated both restrictions when you combined two different paragraphs into one.[1][2] Please don't do this again or you will be reported. - Mr X 🖋 13:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

- @MrX: My bad, but it’s Wikipedia policy to have no more than four paragraphs in the lede Векочел (talk) 05:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Four paragraphs in the lead is a style guideline. It is not meant to be strictly adhered to. In fact, WP:LEAD calls it a rule of thumb. Combining unrelated topics in a single paragraph is not very good writing, but if it were, combining the first two paragraphs of the lead would make more sense. - Mr X 🖋 13:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Feliz Navidad!

Thank you very much TomStar81. I hope you’re also having a nice Christmas. Векочел (talk) 02:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Annexation of the Leeward Islands

Happy holidays. Thank you for the help with reviewing Teriitaria II. I especially appreciate your help with summarizing the article since I struggle with summaries a lot of times. My next project is Annexation of the Leeward Islands. Would you mind taking a look at it and helping me with the summary as well? Thanks. KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Sure, I’ll look at it shortly Векочел (talk) 23:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between October and December 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Thank you Peacemaker67! Векочел (talk) 03:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between October and December 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward III of England. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This encyclopedia is a collaboration. Please discuss differences with other editors. And, once again, please use edit summaries to explain your edits. Eric ^talk 16:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduard, Prince of Anhalt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK courtesy notice

Hello! Your submission of Tariq bin Taimur at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! I think the fact is very strong and definitely belongs at DYK, I just raise a specific WP:V concern with the lack of in-line citations that I don't think will take much effort to clear up. - Astrophobe (talk) 04:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akihito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shōwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mother Teresa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Superior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Diana, Princess of Wales

Hi Векочел, you are invited to join a discussion regarding the lede sentence of the article Diana, Princess of Wales, on the talk page (here). Thank you, cookie monster (2020) 755 03:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Diana, Princess of Wales again

Hi Векочел, there was clear consensus on the talk page of Diana, Princess of Wales, regarding what the lede sentence should read. Please do not change it again without consensus on the talk page. Sincerely, cookie monster (2020) 755 01:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erasmus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating again, Векочел! Could you add answers to the two questions as well please? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between July and September 2020. Harrias (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste `{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}}` to your user space

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nawwaf bin Abdulaziz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Abdullah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Otto von Bismarck

We know that the picture is of Bismarck, since the article is called Otto von Bismarck, the lede sentence of the article says "Otto Eduard Leopold, Prince of Bismarck, Duke of Lauenburg (born von Bismarck-Schönhausen; German: Otto Eduard Leopold Fürst von Bismarck, Herzog zu Lauenburg; 1 April 1815 – 30 July 1898), known as Otto von Bismarck (German: [ˈɔto fɔn ˈbɪsmaʁk] ^ⓘ)...", and the infobox itself says Otto von Bismarck. There is no need to further identify him in the caption to the image. Please stop.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Otto von Bismarck; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

You continue to change the title of the infobox without a WP:CONSENSUS to do so. I have restored the 16-year WP:STATUSQUO title, and started a consensus discussion on the talk page. Do not change the title agaiin without a consensus to do so. The discussion is at Talk:Otto von Bismarck#Infobox title. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Kingdom of France does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. ...once again... Eric ^talk 02:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Moves

How do you make decisions like "not needed" when moving the articles about the members of the Al Saud family? You put notice in some talk pages to call for moves arguing that most of these articles are without their surnames, Al Saud. But when I reviewed the past edits on these articles I have seen that you moved them in June 2020 deleting their surnames, Al Saud.

Please do not move these articles deleting the Al Saud part. If you read news or scientific articles or books on these people, their surnames are used there. In short, your moves will be reverted. In addition, instead of wasting your time to do what you want, you may consider to expand articles using reliable sources. --Egeymi (talk) 15:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Egeymi, from what I can find actually, much of the time the surname is omitted. For instance, a quick search on Prince Muhammad bin Nayef turned up the following:

Mohammed bin Nayef threatened by social media campaign, say Saudi prince's lawyers

In the bitter struggle for Saudi rule, Prince Mohammed bin Salman has struck first

The dazzling rise and tragic fall of Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed bin Nayef

This reflects the general practice of leaving out royal surnames. We generally hear in the news descriptions of Queen Elizabeth II and not Elizabeth Windsor, Mohammed bin Salman (or MBS) and not Mohammed Al Saud, Sultan Qaboos of Oman and not Qaboos Al Said, etc. Also WP:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)#Other royals states Do not use surnames in article titles for such persons. If royals have surnames, then this information should be mentioned in the first line of the article (but care should be taken, as many do not have surnames, and personal surnames may differ from the name of their Royal House). Векочел (talk) 20:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Are you trying to have edit wars?

You argued that capitals should be used giving MOS:JOBTITLE, then read it carefully. Hope you will consider to expand the articles instead of doing such things.

Positions, offices, and occupational titles

Offices, titles, and positions such as president, king, emperor, grand duke, lord mayor, pope, bishop, abbot, prime minister, chief financial officer, and executive director are common nouns and therefore should be in lower case when used generically: Mitterrand was the French president or There were many presidents at the meeting. They are capitalized only in the following cases:

When followed by a person's name to form a title, i.e., when they can be considered to have become part of the name: President Nixon, not president Nixon When a title is used to refer to a specific person as a substitute for their name during their time in office, e.g., the Queen, not the queen (referring to Elizabeth II)

Therefore,

Muḥammad bin Nāyif bin ‘Abd al-‘Azīz Āl Su‘ūd; born 30 August 1959) was Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia and first deputy prime minister from 2015 to 2017^[1] and minister of interior from 2012 to 2017.

should be used given that no title follows the name like in the example, Mitterrand was the French president.

Hope you can get it. --Egeymi (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

There is one additional case where the title is capitalized that you left off:

When a formal title for a specific entity (or conventional translation thereof) is addressed as a title or position in and of itself, is not plural, is not preceded by a modifier (including a definite or indefinite article), and is not a reworded description:

Crown prince is certainly a title, it is not plural, it is not preceded by a modifier (he is not called “a crown prince of Saudi Arabia”, and not a reworded description (we use the exact title) Векочел (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

I think you do not want to read carefully or to understand. Your edits will be corrected. Egeymi (talk) 07:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Carabus azrael moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus azrael, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus aurocinctus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus aurocinctus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus aumonti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus aumonti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus abbreviatus.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Nice work on the article but you must include a citation for what you have written, I have added one to this article but you should be doing the same for any other articles you add.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus adamsi.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Again nice work but must include references

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus acutithorax.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus acorep.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus achilleanus.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus absonus.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Векочел

Thank you for creating Carabus adangensis.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please include references in future articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus biroi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus biroi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Carabus aulacocnemus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carabus aulacocnemus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Referencing

Please stop creating new articles without proper sourcing. I've moved a bunch of yours to draft so you can work on them there. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Don’t change please

Don’t change king of Saudi Arabia Salman. Al-Ghadouri (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Basic Law of Saudi Arabia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries, please

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Eric ^talk 04:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juana Enríquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your page moves of Sultan bin Abdulaziz and Nayef bin Abdulaziz

I have reverted your page moves of Sultan bin Abdulaziz and Nayef bin Abdulaziz per a request made to WP:RMTR (Old revision of WP:RMTR), as well as the most recent WP:RM at Talk:Nayef bin Abdulaziz, Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia#Requested_move_18_November_2020. Looking at the page history, I can see that you've reverted it once before already. Please do not move it back without a discussion through the WP:RM process. If you continue to edit war through page moving, you're likely to be blocked. OhKayeSierra (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saud bin Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haifa bint Faisal Al Saud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saud bin Faisal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Names

Hi, the links you put refer to others, but the parameter reads names, hope I can tell my point --Egeymi (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Egeymi, I thought it might be helpful to the reader to have links to their ancestors, at least for the grandfathers and for the lessser known royals the great grandfathers. Векочел (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hii, everyday you are inserting wls or others to the infoboxes. Honestly I wonder if you are planning to add content to the articles using reliable sources.

And are you considering to look at the past actions made on the articles before inserting such wls or parameters. --Egeymi (talk) 10:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

If I see anything good in the sources I have access to, I will add it. Now to answer your second question, the religion parameter has been kept with royalty. In the description under the infobox royalty template, there is a message that says while the religion parameter has been eliminated in other templates, it is kept in the royalty template because religion is often important to their rule. And it is in use in some articles. Векочел (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries ...

Please use them. You've been here long enough and been asked often enough. Ealdgyth (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries, again...

Hi Векочел, please start using edit summaries as a part of your work here. I just spent time providing a link to the talk-page of the editor who added the "Pharaoh" title to the infobox at Augustus, to justify your change. That should not have been necessary. Cheers, Haploidavey (talk) 07:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Haploidavey. As you say, I do need to use them and will start doing so. Thanks. Векочел (talk) 08:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- I do hope so! You evidently know what you're doing, but the flaws in that Pharoah business won't be obvious to most. Regards Haploidavey (talk) 08:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empire of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caregory:Sons of kings of Saudi Arabia

Hello Векочел,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Caregory:Sons of kings of Saudi Arabia, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Category:Sons of kings of Saudi Arabia. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

(Presumably a typo in creating a category)

JW 1961^Talk 16:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Carabus aurocinctus

Hello, Векочел. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carabus aurocinctus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.