User:Ytzzzeng/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Visual Editor buttons[edit]

Paragraph[edit]

Set the style of your text. For example, make a header or plain paragraph text. You can also use it to offset block quotes.

A[edit]

Highlight your text, then click here to format it with bold, italics, etc. The “More” options allows you to underline (U), cross-out text (S), add code snippets ( { } ), change language keyboards (Aあ), and clear all formatting ().

Links[edit]

Highlight text and push this button to make it a link. The Visual Editor will automatically suggest related Wikipedia articles for that word or phrase. This is a great way to connect your article to more Wikipedia content. You only have to link important words once, usually during the first time they appear. If you want to link to pages outside of Wikipedia (for an “external links” section, for example) click on the “External link” tab.

Cite[edit]

The citation tool in the Visual Editor helps format your citations. You can simply paste a DOI or URL, and the Visual Editor will try to sort out all of the fields you need. Be sure to review it, however, and apply missing fields manually (if you know them). You can also add books, journals, news, and websites manually. That opens up a quick guide for inputting your citations. Once you've added a source, you can click the “re-use” tab to cite it again.

Bullets[edit]

  1. To add bullet points or a numbered list, click here.

Insert[edit]

Girl playing in a sandbox

This tab lets you add media, images, or tables.

Ω[edit]

This tab allows you to add special characters, such as those found in non-English words (αβγ), scientific notation, and a handful of language extensions

Multi-culture in microfluidics[edit]

Compared to the highly complex microenvironment in vivo, traditional mono-culture of single cell types in vitro only provides limited information about cellular behavior due to the lack of interactions with other cell types. Typically, cell-to-cell signaling can be divided into four categories depending on the distance: endocrine signaling, paracrine signaling, autocrine signaling, and juxtacrine signaling [1]. For example, in paracrine signaling, growth factors secreted from one cell diffuse over a short distance to the neighboring target cell [2], whereas in juxtacrine signaling, membrane-bound ligands of one cell directly bind to surface receptors of adjacent cells [3]. There are three conventional approaches to incorporate cell signaling in in vitro cell culture: conditioned media transfer, mixed (or direct) co-culture, and segregated (or indirect) co-culture [4]. The use of conditioned media, where the cultured medium of one cell type (the effector) is introduced to the culture of another cell type (the responder), is a traditional way to include the effects of soluble factors in cell signaling [5]. However, this method only allows one-way signaling, does not apply to short-lived factors (which often degrade before transfer to the responder cell culture), and does not allow temporal observations of the secreted factors [6]. Recently, co-culture has become the predominant approach to study the effect of cellular communication by culturing two biologically related cell types together. Mixed co-culture is the simplest co-culture method, where two types of cells are in direct contact within a single culture compartment at the desired cell ratio [7]. Cells can communicate by paracrine and juxtacrine signaling, but separated treatments and downstream analysis of a single cell type are not readily feasible due to the completely mixed population of cells [8][9]. The more common method is segregated co-culture, where the two cell types are physically separated but can communicate in shared media by paracrine signaling. The physical barrier can be a porous membrane, a solid wall, or a hydrogel divider [8][9][10][11][12][13]. If the physical barrier is removable (such as in PDMS or hydrogel), the assay can also be used to study cell invasion or cell migration [9][12]. Co-culture designs can be adapted to tri- or multi-culture, which are often more representative of in vivo conditions relative to co-culture [9][10][14][15].

Closed channel multi-culture systems[edit]

The flexibility of microfluidic devices greatly contributes to the development of multi-culture studies by improved control over spatial patterns. Closed channel systems made by PDMS are most commonly used because PDMS has traditionally enabled rapid prototyping. For example, mixed co-culture can be achieved in droplet-based microfluidics easily by a co-encapsulation system to study paracrine and juxtacrine signaling [16]. Two types of cells are co-encapsulated in droplets by combining two streams of cell-laden agarose solutions. After gelation, the agarose microgels will serve as a 3D microenvironment for cell co-culture [16]. Segregated co-culture is also realized in microfluidic channels to study paracrine signaling. Human alveolar epithelial cells and microvascular endothelial cells can be co-cultured in compartmentalized PDMS channels, separated by a thin, porous, and stretchable PDMS membrane to mimic alveolar-capillary barrier [11]. Endothelial cells can also be co-cultured with cancer cells in a monolayer while separated by a 3D collagen scaffold to study endothelial cell migration and capillary growth [17]. When embedded in gels, salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) cells can be co-cultured with carcinoma-associated fibroblast (CAF) in a 3D extracellular matrix to study stroma-regulated cancer invasion in the 3D environment [18]. If juxtacrine signaling is to be investigated solely without paracrine signaling, a single cell coupling co-culture microfluidic array can be designed based on a cellular valving principle [19].

Open channel multi-culture systems[edit]

Although closed channel microfluidics (discussed in the section above) offers high customizability and biological complexity for multi-culture, the operation often requires handling expertise and specialized equipment, such as pumps and valves [9][13]. In addition, the use of PDMS is known to cause adverse effects to cell culture, including leaching of oligomers or absorption of small molecules, thus often doubted by biologists [20]. Therefore, open microfluidic devices made of polystyrene (PS), a well-established cell culture material, started to emerge [20]. The advantages of open multi-culture designs are direct pipette accessibility and easy fabrication (micro-milling, 3D printing, injection molding, or razor-printing – without the need for a subsequent bonding step or channel clearance techniques) [9][13][21][22][23]. They can also be incorporated into traditional cultureware (well plate or petri dish) while remaining the complexity for multi-culture experiments [9][13][22][23]. For example, the ‘monorail device’ which patterns hydrogel walls along a rail via spontaneous capillary flow can be inserted into commercially available 24-well plates [22]. Flexible patterning geometries are achieved by merely changing 3D printed or milled inserts. The monorail device can also be adapted to study multikingdom soluble factor signaling, which is difficult in traditional shared media co-culture due to the different media and culture requirements for microbial and mammalian cells [22]. Another open multi-culture device fabricated by razor-printing is capable of integrating numerous culture modalities, including 2D, 3D, Transwell, and spheroid culture [9]. It also shows improved diffusion to promote soluble factor paracrine signaling [9].


  1. ^ Cooper, Geoffrey M. (2000). "Signaling Molecules and Their Receptors". The Cell: A Molecular Approach. 2nd edition.
  2. ^ WORDINGER, ROBERT J.; CLARK, ABBOT F. (2008), "Growth Factors and Neurotrophic Factors as Targets", Ocular Therapeutics, Elsevier, pp. 87–116, ISBN 978-0-12-370585-3, retrieved 2020-06-12
  3. ^ Torii, Keiko U (2004), "Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Kinases in Plants: Structure, Function, and Signal Transduction Pathways", International Review of Cytology, Elsevier, pp. 1–46, ISBN 978-0-12-364638-5, retrieved 2020-06-12
  4. ^ Regier, Mary C.; Alarid, Elaine T.; Beebe, David J. (2016). "Progress towards understanding heterotypic interactions in multi-culture models of breast cancer". Integrative Biology. 8 (6): 684–692. doi:10.1039/C6IB00001K. ISSN 1757-9694. PMC 4993016. PMID 27097801.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  5. ^ Lyons, R M; Keski-Oja, J; Moses, H L (1988-05-01). "Proteolytic activation of latent transforming growth factor-beta from fibroblast-conditioned medium". The Journal of Cell Biology. 106 (5): 1659–1665. doi:10.1083/jcb.106.5.1659. ISSN 0021-9525.
  6. ^ Bogdanowicz, Danielle R.; Lu, Helen H. (2013-04). "Studying cell-cell communication in co-culture". Biotechnology Journal. 8 (4): 395–396. doi:10.1002/biot.201300054. PMC 4230534. PMID 23554248. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  7. ^ Gandolfi, F.; Moor, R. M. (1987-09-01). "Stimulation of early embryonic development in the sheep by co-culture with oviduct epithelial cells". Reproduction. 81 (1): 23–28. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0810023. ISSN 1470-1626.
  8. ^ a b Benam, Kambez H; Villenave, Remi; Lucchesi, Carolina; Varone, Antonio; Hubeau, Cedric; Lee, Hyun-Hee; Alves, Stephen E; Salmon, Michael; Ferrante, Thomas C; Weaver, James C; Bahinski, Anthony (2016-02). "Small airway-on-a-chip enables analysis of human lung inflammation and drug responses in vitro". Nature Methods. 13 (2): 151–157. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3697. ISSN 1548-7091. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i Álvarez-García, Yasmín R.; Ramos-Cruz, Karla P.; Agostini-Infanzón, Reinaldo J.; Stallcop, Loren E.; Beebe, David J.; Warrick, Jay W.; Domenech, Maribella (2018). "Open multi-culture platform for simple and flexible study of multi-cell type interactions". Lab on a Chip. 18 (20): 3184–3195. doi:10.1039/C8LC00560E. ISSN 1473-0197.
  10. ^ a b Hatherell, Kathryn; Couraud, Pierre-Olivier; Romero, Ignacio A.; Weksler, Babette; Pilkington, Geoffrey J. (2011-08). "Development of a three-dimensional, all-human in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier using mono-, co-, and tri-cultivation Transwell models". Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 199 (2): 223–229. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.012. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  11. ^ a b Huh, D.; Matthews, B. D.; Mammoto, A.; Montoya-Zavala, M.; Hsin, H. Y.; Ingber, D. E. (2010-06-25). "Reconstituting Organ-Level Lung Functions on a Chip". Science. 328 (5986): 1662–1668. doi:10.1126/science.1188302. ISSN 0036-8075.
  12. ^ a b Wang, I-Ning E.; Shan, Jing; Choi, Rene; Oh, Seongcheol; Kepler, Christopher K.; Chen, Faye H.; Lu, Helen H. (2007-12). "Role of osteoblast–fibroblast interactions in the formation of the ligament-to-bone interface". Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 25 (12): 1609–1620. doi:10.1002/jor.20475. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. ^ a b c d Zhang, Tianzi; Lih, Daniel; Nagao, Ryan J; Xue, Jun; Berthier, Erwin; Himmelfarb, Jonathan; Zheng, Ying; Theberge, Ashleigh B (2020-05-11). "Open microfluidic coculture reveals paracrine signaling from human kidney epithelial cells promotes kidney specificity of endothelial cells". American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology: ajprenal.00069.2020. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00069.2020. ISSN 1931-857X.
  14. ^ Regier, Mary C.; Maccoux, Lindsey J.; Weinberger, Emma M.; Regehr, Keil J.; Berry, Scott M.; Beebe, David J.; Alarid, Elaine T. (2016-08). "Transitions from mono- to co- to tri-culture uniquely affect gene expression in breast cancer, stromal, and immune compartments". Biomedical Microdevices. 18 (4): 70. doi:10.1007/s10544-016-0083-x. ISSN 1387-2176. PMC 5076020. PMID 27432323. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  15. ^ Theberge, Ashleigh B.; Yu, Jiaquan; Young, Edmond W. K.; Ricke, William A.; Bushman, Wade; Beebe, David J. (2015-03-17). "Microfluidic Multiculture Assay to Analyze Biomolecular Signaling in Angiogenesis". Analytical Chemistry. 87 (6): 3239–3246. doi:10.1021/ac503700f. ISSN 0003-2700. PMC 4405103. PMID 25719435.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  16. ^ a b Tumarkin, Ethan; Tzadu, Lsan; Csaszar, Elizabeth; Seo, Minseok; Zhang, Hong; Lee, Anna; Peerani, Raheem; Purpura, Kelly; Zandstra, Peter W.; Kumacheva, Eugenia (2011). "High-throughput combinatorial cell co-culture using microfluidics". Integrative Biology. 3 (6): 653. doi:10.1039/c1ib00002k. ISSN 1757-9694.
  17. ^ Chung, Seok; Sudo, Ryo; Mack, Peter J.; Wan, Chen-Rei; Vickerman, Vernella; Kamm, Roger D. (2009). "Cell migration into scaffolds under co-culture conditions in a microfluidic platform". Lab Chip. 9 (2): 269–275. doi:10.1039/B807585A. ISSN 1473-0197.
  18. ^ Liu, Tingjiao; Lin, Bingcheng; Qin, Jianhua (2010). "Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts promoted tumor spheroid invasion on a microfluidic 3D co-culture device". Lab on a Chip. 10 (13): 1671. doi:10.1039/c000022a. ISSN 1473-0197.
  19. ^ Frimat, Jean-Philippe; Becker, Marco; Chiang, Ya-Yu; Marggraf, Ulrich; Janasek, Dirk; Hengstler, Jan G.; Franzke, Joachim; West, Jonathan (2011). "A microfluidic array with cellular valving for single cell co-culture". Lab Chip. 11 (2): 231–237. doi:10.1039/C0LC00172D. ISSN 1473-0197.
  20. ^ a b Berthier, Erwin; Young, Edmond W. K.; Beebe, David (2012). "Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia". Lab on a Chip. 12 (7): 1224. doi:10.1039/c2lc20982a. ISSN 1473-0197.
  21. ^ Lee, Younggyun; Choi, Jin Woo; Yu, James; Park, Dohyun; Ha, Jungmin; Son, Kyungmin; Lee, Somin; Chung, Minhwan; Kim, Ho-Young; Jeon, Noo Li (2018). "Microfluidics within a well: an injection-molded plastic array 3D culture platform". Lab on a Chip. 18 (16): 2433–2440. doi:10.1039/C8LC00336J. ISSN 1473-0197.
  22. ^ a b c d Berry, Samuel B.; Zhang, Tianzi; Day, John H.; Su, Xiaojing; Wilson, Ilham Z.; Berthier, Erwin; Theberge, Ashleigh B. (2017). "Upgrading well plates using open microfluidic patterning". Lab on a Chip. 17 (24): 4253–4264. doi:10.1039/C7LC00878C. ISSN 1473-0197.
  23. ^ a b Day, John H.; Nicholson, Tristan M.; Su, Xiaojing; van Neel, Tammi L.; Clinton, Ivor; Kothandapani, Anbarasi; Lee, Jinwoo; Greenberg, Max H.; Amory, John K.; Walsh, Thomas J.; Muller, Charles H. (2020). "Injection molded open microfluidic well plate inserts for user-friendly coculture and microscopy". Lab on a Chip. 20 (1): 107–119. doi:10.1039/C9LC00706G. ISSN 1473-0197. PMC 6917835. PMID 31712791.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)