User:Tegwarrior
Recognition Received[edit]
Regarding reversions[1] made on September 22 2007 to Israel[edit]
- FWIW: This third revert was done to undo user:okedem's fifth revert of the day, which I had asked him to undo himself in order to avoid being blocked (he wouldn't) and which I had reported him for an hour earlier (no action taken in that hour) and after I pleaded with several other editors involved in the article to restore just the POV flag I had placed and that okedem had removed with his fifth revert of the day (none of them would).
- Diff4 (partial revert; POV tag removal is what I counted)
- FWIW: This fourth "revert" was to place a POV flag on an article that had changed and that in my opinion had become more biased than the article on which I placed my earlier POV flag, which this POV flag was allegedly a "reversion" to. I note that any deletion of a POV flag while the person who placed it is still involved in discussions over the matters of alleged bias is a clear violation of the direction on the POV template: "Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved."
- Diff5 (this edit is essentially equal to the previous POV tag removal)
- FWIW: This fifth "revert" was to add sectionPOV flags to all of the sections I believed had POV issues after another editor replaced my article POV flag with a sectionPOV flag that he decided, without consulting me and without any apparent regard for comments that I had made to him about my concerns about bias, addressed every concern I had raised.
Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I saw this on your user talk page earlier. People add POV tags all the time, and I know it sounds stupid, but that itself results in disputes/conflicts at times. However, I still stand by my block. There was a dispute over the POV tag. A number of users disagreed with its addition. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)