User:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive14

Thanks for your support in my RfA!

Thanks for voting! Hello RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive14, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Get better!

I hope everything ends up alright! Feel better, and I'm sure Wikipedia will still be here when you get back :D Cowman109^Talk 18:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Cowman paid me off with money, drugs, and many cheap women to come tell you to get better. So get better. CQJ 18:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeouch, I do hope you get better, using all of the admin buttons is a bit hard with only one arm :-( Cyde↔Weys 18:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I'll be casting some healing spells to help you get better. Best of luck

GET BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YAYAYAYAAAAAAAR
DAAAAAYHO
SIYA SIYA
COOOOOOOOOORDIAMBOXAAAA

There. That was an improvised healing spell, it should channel some funky energies into your talk page, which will then funnel directly into your pineal gland via osmosis, or something of that mystical nature. --The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 18:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

So sorry to hear about your arm. Take care. FloNight ^talk 18:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Ow. Heal well. DS 19:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Please allow the physical therapy and the drugs to make your arm better or else I'll have to do something to that surgeon. ;) —THIS IS MESSEDOCKER (TALK) 19:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I just saw the note on your userpage. I hope you get better soon. 71.248.226.246 02:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you very much for your support for my recent RfA, which I'm quite happy to announce has passed with a consensus of 67 supporting, 0 opposed and 0 neutral. I'm glad you took the time to evaluate my candidacy, and I'll be working hard to justify the vote of confidence you've placed in me. Please let me know at my talk page if you have any comments on my performance as an admin. Thanks! TheProject 02:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Best wishes for your own RfA.

Your RfA

I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:

• Administrators' reading list
• Administrators' how-to guide
• Administrator's Noticeboard

• Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents
• Administrator's Noticeboard for Three-revert-rule violations

Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! Redux 02:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats!

Congratulations, on your promotion to administrator!! FloNight ^talk

Congrats on being an admin. I hope everything else goes right for you. I know you'll be fine in the end. Yanksox 02:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats. Glad I got in on the last minute to vote support. — The King of Kings 02:50 July 01 '06

Been a long time coming. Congrats, and hope your arm gets better soon. NSLE 03:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Huge congratulations to you, man. For several months, I was thinking that of everyone here that wasn't an admin, you deserved to be promoted more than anybody. Thanks for nominating me a while back too; I personally haven't used the tools very often (I'm still an editor with admin powers!), but when I have used them I've been thankful to have them. I hope things work out well for you to come back here soon; it's always great having you around! Good luck to you with everything, and I'll be praying that your arm will get better. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 03:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 03:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

:) Jude (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for voting, hopefully I'll be back fully by the 18th of July, I'll going to do some very light editing mostly in Sundays. My therapy is four days an week plus some heavy rest. Hopefully I can gain movement again in my right elbow. Just unexpected. Thanks. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! Finally you are an admin, continue to be a great Wikipedian! I hope your arm gets better, get well soon. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 04:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations, tell us when you're ready to join us. --Cyde↔Weys 05:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! You deserve it after so long. We know you will be a good admin.--208.62.125.146 05:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to chime in and add my congrats, too! I didn't get a chance to comment in the RFA because Real Life has gotten in the way of Wiki lately, but I offer my full support. Get better soon! szyslak (t, c, e) 09:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

AT LAST!!! Congratulations! — FireFox 11:03, 01 July '06

*blows party whistle-thingy I don't know the name of* Will (message me!) 12:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

w00t!

— Jul. 1, '06 [14:21] <freak|talk>

• Congratulations on your new admin status. I hope that you take onboard all of the constructive criticism that was offered and really show how good an admin you can be. Don't forget, in times of stress take a step back and don't be afraid to ask for help or advice if you need it! Get well soon!  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  14:44, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Jaranda. I just want to say I'm really, really pleased that you've become an admin. It's long overdue. I was impressed by your concern and support for Katefan0 at a very sad time a month ago, and I'm sure you'll be an even greater help to all victims of harassment now that you have "the tools". Hope your arm gets better soon. Cheers, and Congratulations! AnnH ♫ 20:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Warmest congratulations! :) Nobody has had to work through so many obstacles in order to get the tools, and I know you'll impress in your new role! I do hope you feel better soon as well. Best wishes, Xoloz 21:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations for becoming admin. *~Daniel~* 02:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

My congratulations also! Andy _t 21:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Get better soon

Get better soon!

Music Samples

Hi, I see you've responded to the straw poll at Wikipedia_talk:Music_samples. Since your vote, there has been some further discussion here, and I've suggested a slight amendment to the proposed guideline. I'd really appreciate your feedback on the subject. Thanks!

P.S. Sorry to hear about the medical problems. Best wishes on the road to recovery!!--Wine Guy Talk 19:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Your RFA

Mazel tov!!!

Closing AFD discussions

Since you recently got promoted to admin, I would like to remind you that when you delete an article on AFD, paste the link to the discussion in the "Reason for deletion" box (ie add [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article]] ) instead of just entering "per AFD". It makes it easier for everybody else to have easy access to the AFD discussion instead of trying to search for it. Please refer to WP:DPR for more information. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Ann Frank's Cats

You closed that AfD today with ano consensus tag. The article had previously been AfD'd and the consensus was merge.

Since the article had been previously tagged with a merge tag, then I assume that the no consensus decision means that it stands as it is - and the merge tag be replaced? Could you arrange that? I also assume that since the article was due to be merged more than 5 days ago that it should be deleted forthwith?Neuropean 20:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

There was a fair share of both merge, keep and delete votes so I closed it as no consensus. You can merge it if you want. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 21:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid that, as ever, Neuropean is misrepresenting in order to pursue his vendetta and little campaign. The previous discussion (when a much smaller and different article was called just Moortje) waqs speedily closed because Neuropean had opened the AfD (as his 2nd eber edit - strange) and then, within 10 minutes voted for a merge. The reult was NOT merge but to discuss a merge - a very different matter. Pwerhaps you'd care to look at Neuropean's contributions and behvaiour in the past two weeks. Certainly their is point-making and a very destructiuve approach to certain articles, there is also a rather alarming fixation with my edits. He has been warned about his behaviour but continues. What do you suggest? Robertsteadman 07:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2

The July issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Get well soon

I hope your arm mends with physical therapy. Best of luck! -Tapir Terrific 02:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Sweet J

My sweet Jaranda, above everything else, we care about you, our friend, so allow me to wish you the best, and may your arm heal satisfactory, and very fast - I know angels rely on their wings mostly, but we need you to keep on typing! ;) That is what matters to me now, more than anything; that you are well. Second in my list is to share my happyness of finally seeing you as an admin, for I know it has been a personal dream of yours for even longer than many of us have been here. It has been a long, long wait, and so many names have passed in the meantime... yet you persevered, offering nothing but your very best, and here you are. I am so proud of you, J.

Please take good care of yourself. We'll always keep a seat for you here. You'll be in my prayers tonight, and every night, until you're back with us fully recovered and smiling. An enormous hug, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 04:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

The block of 172.191.43.75

From what is seen in the edit history of the vandal 172.191.43.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), I don't think that it's a shared proxy, even if it is an AOL IP. The user made multiple edits to his page, and I think the user may require a lengthier block. Ryulong 05:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Get better and help please, with the article you keep deleting of mine

Firstly I wish you all the best with getting better, I know how bad a broken arm is-someone running into you and you stick out your arm!ouchy- I hope you get better and you'll be able to contribute to Wikipedia 3 times the amount you are now!!

I need your help a little bit, after speaking to wikibot, he told me to contact you, I can understand why you have been deleting my article (2-4-2), I am very new to editing wikipedia-been reading for year and tried to start a new article that has been getting some publicity, due to their new Television series thats coming up, they have had hits in japan etc, but I can understand you getting rid, by thinking its some self promotion but they are getting quite big in britian and about to shoot to international fame as well, so I thought Ill get the ball rolling when I heard a radio interview-and seeing them in Marie Claire (magazine). I have nothing to do with the band, just was eager to write my first real post. If you have anydoubt please visit http://www.greyologyinc.com/artists.php?id=1 to see about them-I am sorry for the understanding I hope you will reinstate the article.Horfsby 08:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)horfsby

I do not think you have read the article at all, or done any research on it to show that they are a band, just like the ska band, which I have also heard, just because it is not american and famous like the beatles people still want to read up about bands. THINK BEFORE YOU delete, on advice I am putting the article up again.Horfsby 08:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)horfsby

Healing thoughts

Sorry to hear about the complications, Jaranda. I wish you the best of luck for all to go well and for you to get better soon. -- Natalya 17:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Removed section from Don Hutson article

You could've let me know. Anyway, what do you want to make it ok?--82.6.169.187 18:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC) How's this [1],[2] and this [3]?

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism in my userspace. I just noticed that- these page moves don't appear on my watchlist. Incidentally, congratulations on your RfA, hope there are no hard feeling over my failure to support. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Sysop actions

Hi, hope you're feeling better soon. Congratulations on your promotion to sysop. Two things:

• According to WP:BP, you should never block yourself for testing purposes.
• I noticed that you speedied Skippy The Fridge as an A7. Unlike many of the other criteria, it's often not immediately obvious just by looking at the article whether it meets the criterion or not. So, it's especially important to read the article before speedying something under that criterion. In this case, the article claimed that they were "one of the finest ska bands of all time", which is an assertion of notability. I've restored the article.

No harm done in either case, just wanted to let you know. Cheers, JYolkowski // talk 00:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Upholding the electric fence.

After going to report User:Wiki-star, was going to follow it up with a 3RR report on KojiDude to uphold the electric fence, but I noticed you already did. Here's my compliments to the new admin for this. Kevin_b_er 04:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

We have more in common than I thought..

1. Frequent wikibreaks
2. Multiple RFA attempts (although you just passed yours :P)
3. Wikipedians in Florida
4. Time on Wikipedia (although I gotcha by a 1 month exactly :D)

Hmm..a twin. :) — The King of Kings 05:45 July 03 '06

Try to defend your blocking me

I did not have 4 reverts in a 24 hour period, and yet you blocked me. Do you get to ban people for WP:2RR while everybody else can only do WP:3RR? I believe you are abusing your power. How do I report you for this? Nokilli 07:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that.

Condolences on your health complications... I hope you'll recover soon! —Nightstallion (?) 12:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. Prodego ^talk 03:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for Supporting my RfA!

Thanks for supporting my RfA, which passed by a margin of 54/6/1. Sorry for the tardy "thanks," but between the World Cup, and hand-typing each of these, it has taken a while to say the least. If you ever see me doing something as admin that I'm not supposed to be doing, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Thanks again, Ian Manka Talk to me! 18:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

HRE

Just read your edit summary on HRE's RfA and just thought I let you know that although I am absolutely certain you did not intend it to sound unsympathetic... If this in fact isn't someone playing a sick joke, and HRE has been killed then your removal of support and comment "this dead thing gets sorted out" could come off in rather poor taste to the more sensitive users. Just thought I'd make you aware but if you take another look and disagree, (as I may be well off base) then pls disregard. Thanks - Glen 00:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Yea wrong wording, hopefully this is just an hoax and he's not dead, I apolozgize if I hurt anyone. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi, you've blocked me

Hello, you've blocked me from editing and I'm currently working on expanding an article on Barry University. I mean no harm and I do have citations, please let me know what I have to fix so that we can resolve this issue as promptly as possible.

I would like to contribute to the Barry University article as it's a stump and it merits expansion. I'm new to editing, so please bare with me while I try to follow the rules that i've unknowingly broken.

I look forward to your response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jutland86 (talk • contribs)

WP:AID reversion thanks

You beat me to the revert of Tawkerbot's edit! Thanks!  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Brainbug

Hi, I was wondering why you deleted the Brainbug stub. - Cybergoth 16:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I deleted it because it had no claim to notablity via A7. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 18:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I see. I did not intend to create a vanity stub. I think the band is notable for a few reasons:

1. There was a request for this article,
2. The band is noteworthy for contributing music to a couple of movies (including A Night at the Roxbury although the track did not make it on the soundtrack album), and television commercial (for Nissan apparently), and
3. It is a fairly popular band.

Would you consider re-instating the stub and letting myself or others work on it? - Cybergoth 21:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I restored it. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! - Cybergoth 18:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

My RFA

Thank you for your vote in my RFA, which succeeded with a final tally of 66-0-4. If there's anything I can help you with now that I'm an admin, please let me know on my talk page. Again, thanks! Mangojuicetalk 20:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Beat you

Beat you to reverting the other part of the pagemove vandalism. Though props to deleting leftover junk pages before I could get back to tag them for CSD, and for nailing the first ones. Kevin_b_er 01:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Article you deleted

Why would you delete the Mike Jones article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.230.52.61 (talk • contribs) 01:29, July 5, 2006 (UTC)

Probably to remove personal information, judging by the delete summary. Kevin_b_er 01:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Ya, well I put a line from one of his song in the article. Mike Jones gives out his phone number on his album Who is Mike Jones?. I still do not understand the page would be deleted.

Several versions had real phone numbers, I couldn't remove all though as this is to time consuming, clicking 1,200 revertions. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

WOW

For having an awsome user page, you are presented with the Excellent User Page Award. --serbiana - talk 03:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

REALLY COOOOOOL USER PAGE!!! I LOVE IT!!! Have a barnstar! You REEEEEALY deserve it! All the best, --serbiana - talk 03:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi

Regardin you speedy deleting this. I would like to argue that it is not a copyvio in the comon sense, since it is not in article space. In other words, if that text would have been in a talk page or my article space, nobody would have deleted it. I further argue that it is no more of a copyvio than the Google cache of the same. Would google have chaced it if doing so was a copyvio? The aim of that is not to claim ownership, just to make a copy of the information so it won't get lost, since it is at risk of geting lost, considering that the main article of that is deleted, hence why i reference the google cach. What is you respons, don't you agree that a copy in non-article space is fine and actualy fair use? If the problem is that the copy is linked to, then we could un-link it. I mean, would you have deleted the copy if it was in a talk page sub-space? Peace--Striver 15:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Hmm articles are not fair use and it's a copyvio, even if it's in a talk page or your subpage. Better off to copy it somewhere else. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

You've got mail

Please check your e-mail. My block has now expired, but I'd like some further clarification regarding it. Thanks. Todor→Bozhinov 13:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

User:24.20.70.130

Hey -- you unblocked this account which was formerly blocked as an open proxy. Did you find out for sure the proxy is no longer there? If so, you should remove the {{unblock}} and the proxy block notice from the user talk page (and say what you did to check). If not, we should probably reblock until we can confirm. Mangojuice^talk 16:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

You have deleted the speedy deletion on the Olga Kharitidi page. Can you please insert a non-speedy deletion for me? Thanks. --GoOdCoNtEnT 23:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Late Night Killers

Can you throw the {deletedpage} tag on Late Night Killers? They've already tried to repost their article before you stepped in. Targetter 02:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Yes! Thank you! Targetter 02:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi, thanks for deleting my Guywonder page. I fail to see how it is classed as 'nonsense' when you have such articles as The Perry Bible Fellowship on wikipedia as well. As I stated, Guywonder is in the process of being displayed online and already has over 30 readers of the comic strip.

How is that nonsense?

Late Night Killers: Part 2

Jaranda, I think I might have made a mistake in asking for {deletedpage}. The author came back and posting information to claim notability for the group. Could you take a look at it and post your opinion at the bottom of that talk page? It looks like that article may have to be restored. Link: Talk:Late Night Killers -- Targetter 03:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Thank you for your speedy arbitration, Jaranda. Targetter 03:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• My sincerest apologies, Jaranda, but He's not done, so I'm afraid I had no choice but to do this... (next subtopic)

Late Night Killers on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Late Night Killers. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.

Lion Ambassadors

I just recreated (with new content) an article you speedy deleted. The article was quite poor, and you may still consider the recreated version a good AFD candidate, so I thought I would let you know what I'm up to. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 18:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Category:Protected deleted pages

Hi Jaranda; What should I do to help clear the backlog? De-link references to the deleted+protected page, and then what? Tom Harrison ^Talk 22:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping me so much

I am deeply sorry for the sins I have commited here. I hope my reëntry here will be sincerely welcomed. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 19:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy close??

What gives? --JoanneB 19:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

As the admin. involved now, may I ask that some type of RfC be filed now, seeing that his edits were so violent - I listed detailed on his user talk page here. NOVO-REI 20:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I read your comment, but I think it should be noted that according to his own confession he had over 20 sockpuppets as the

named vandal and according to this pages history, over 43 sockpuppets to John Reid, not including his talk and auxiliary pages. Also, it should be noted that much of his vandalism probably went without notice, as he was considered a good user. But that is over 60 sockpuppets that he confessed to. Something should be done. NOVO-REI 21:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Alot of us knows that, if he vandalises or uses a sock on more time, he's blocked indef and for good. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 21:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

FWIW, I endorse your close. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 21:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Resent Speedy deletion

Please restore the Dennis Detwiller page you recently deleted as seen here. No warning was placed on my—the creator's—talk page, nor was a reasonable amount of time given for a {{hangon}} to contest the {{db-bio}} placed on the page. To start, I am not Mr. Detwiller, nor do I know him, so it is not a vanity page. The only potentialy valid reason for the deletion could be you felt that the article, as it was at time of deletion, did not assert Mr. Detwiller's notability well enough. The article was created as a stub with the express purpose of expantion, and checking the What links here link from the page would have revealed a number of links to that page, one of note being a Requested articles page and the other being the Origins Award winner roleplaying game Delta Green.
—Asatruer 22:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I restored it, next time please add more content. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 22:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much! How much/what kind of content do you feel is necessary to prevent the deletion of a stub?
—Asatruer 23:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Indefinite block of MP123

Jorge, would you please shorten the block of User:MP123 (aka User:Microphon200 and User:CubsFan2006) to something reasonable, like a week or a month? Extraordinarily long blocks for this type of user tend to have the opposite effect than intended, if you know what I mean. ×Meegs 03:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I was the one who reviewed the unblock request of the blocked user. I say that the user should be indef blocked still. One, Jimbo has asked for users who keep on breaking copyright rules, despite many warnings, to be blocked. These guys only hurt the project. Two, he has been told many times to stop what he has been doing. Three, he has socks, so this is a perfect reason we have to block him indef. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

That user has been giving several last chances in 3 different accounts though but keeps on uploading copyvio images, I see no point in blocking for a week. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I have followed this user for months [4] and was the first to block them. This user is not hostile to the project, and has made many good edits throughout their time here. Further, in the past they have (very slowly) responded to direction and warnings by at least moving to different types of copyright violation. I am as frustrated with them as anyone, but telling them to leave and never come back is not appropriate, and, more importantly, will not work.

An Indefinite block will, in the worst case, turn a good-faith editor into an enemy. More likely though, and this is what I was trying to avoid spilling, it will drive them to sockpuppetry. If it does, their uploads become much harder to keep track of, and our next message to them will start from square one, "{{welcome}}, please do not do that."

I propose either reducing their block to a few weeks, or offering to unblock them on the condition that they abandon image work altogether. In either case, I'd like to keep them engaged and in our sight. ×Meegs 04:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Denied. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 04:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)I was told a two week block was given. Ok, but this user is on a very short leash with me. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 04:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I reblocked for 2 weeks, and gave a stern warning on MP123 talk page, I hope he stops Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

What to do with "vandal" template accusation?

What does it mean for a user to add the template "vandal" with my username? What should I do about it? e.g. See Duncharris Dunc|☺ trying to delete the Just-so story page. He repeatedly reverted major additions I had added due to his strong POV against any criticism of evolution. I put the material on the discussion page [[5]]. On the delete page, viewers have voted 11:4 to keep it. See: [[6]] I do not believe I have acted as a vandal. If anything, Dunc|☺ has repeatedly reverted without discussion or moved material for deletion that he does not like. PS thanks for managing the 3RR block. I needed the lesson.) DLH 03:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)DLH

Welcome back

Welcome back Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Not back, just weak. But thank you… --fvw* 06:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Birth & XHTML

Hello. Why not write your birth date on your userpage? Furthermore, your userpage does not look good in all browsers (among them Konqueror, Firefox), i don't think the rendered XHTML Standard results in the look you've expected. (or something like that wtf) --Ysangkok 09:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

AfD closure

Ref: your closure of the Word bookstore. My understanding is that Wikipedia:Consensus is normally from about 60% to over 80%. This discussion had 7 keep votes, 4 delete votes plus nom = 5 delete votes - 7: 5 is less than 60% (58.3% recurring)- no concensus - I don't think rounding up was appropriate - 60% is the lower limit - might make no difference to the outcome, makes a difference to how the outcome is recorded. --A Y Arktos\^talk 10:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)