User talk:Putmedown

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Putmedown! I am GreaterWikiholic , and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Hello, Welcome to the Hotel Wikipedia! I do hope you stay here permenantly and join us in making the Encyclopedia a better place. You shall write articles, revert vandalism, you will have fun here and you shall become a Wikiholic (like me). Please refrain from Vandalisim. Thank you, and welcome again. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! GreaterWikiholic 23:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I accept the Nomination[edit]

I noticed that you nominated me for Administrator. I accept that nomination. Many thanks. I do enjoy cleaning up Wikipedia and helping new users. GreaterWikiholic 23:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks[edit]

Thanks for the smile:)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/67.87.225.29[edit]

Anonymous users cannot serve as administrators. If you intent to contribute to the encyclopedia, please do. However, Wikipedia is not a playground, and I can't figure out why you have attempted to nominate a second user for adminship when you've done nothing else but play in the sandbox, with the exception of your nomination of GreaterWikiholic (talk · contribs) and sending a few smiles. - auburnpilot talk 16:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Putmedown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i logged on for the first time today now and have not made any edits since May 31, 2007 probably a weak password (123)

Decline reason:

We've heard it all before. — Sandstein 17:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Putmedown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am serious i have not logged on since 31 May if you do not believe me try to log in to my account using the password 123 and also what do you mean by sock, i only have one account and i rarely may edit under my ip 67.87.225.29 and i did not log in since 31 May

Decline reason:

As per Sandstein, above. Weak password is not an excuse. — ♠P M C♠ 02:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Putmedown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is unreasonable, it was not me if you do not unblock me can you at least set the block to expire at some point in time, i promise i will change my password and make it stronger

Decline reason:

Seems like you're either a sock or a sockpuppeteer, given another sock. — Kurykh 00:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Putmedown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have one account and that is all i have please reduce my block so i can edit again and also can you show me evidence that i am a sock puppet because i do not like being called a liar or a sock puppet

Decline reason:

You've had three unblock requests which is two more than you're entitled to. You're not getting any more.— Chaser - T 02:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.