User:Gerda Arendt/ACE 2019

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please first read User:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris/A pocket guide to Arbitration. Then pay a minute of silence to its author whom to have known was one of the pleasures on the site. He would have been an arb for whom I'd have voted without a question.

If you want analysis and recommendations, look what others offer. To know what I go for, or just compare what the candidates answered, stay here and read their answers, abbreviated by "agree" and others shortcuts for sometimes verbuous comments.

Questions[edit]

I wanted to ask one simple question:

I commented in the Fram case, decision talk, like this:
Comment by Gerda
Trying to keep it simple: I believe that Fram's admin rights were removed out of process, and should be restored without questions. In case of future problems, the community can get back to arbcom. A new RfA right now seems to offer no fair chances. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC).
Imagine you had been an arb, what would you have written in reply? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

For clarification, I added a second question:

Second question, same thread: LouisAlain?

Finally, if I still couldn't figure out what the answer to the first questions would have been, I asked which remedy the candidate would have supported. I would have supported 2a, as Worm That Turned and Opabinia regalis, or 2e, which was not yet there when I commented, but was prepared with great effort by GorillaWarfare.

As some seemed to have trouble understanding what I wanted to know, I summarized later:

I commented in the Fram case, decision talk, like this. If you had been an arb then, what might you have replied, and/or which of the remedies under 2 would you have supported?

Looking at the answers[edit]

I looked at the answers, and marked what I liked, which doesn't necessarily mean I will vote for them, - other factors may play a role.

My question: I wanted to see a clear statement of in dubio pro reo. None of us could look at the secret evidence, but we could see some open evidence which raised doubts - at least with me - about the quality of the allegations. I also looked at how concise a candidate could deliver a message, at my former experiences with a candidate, and at recent contributions. Candidates marked green will most likely get my vote, as of the first day of voting. I'll give the others another chance. I am sad about Hevrin Khalaf - protest pictured, which matters much more than arbcom. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Cassianto asked some candidates questions about a case in which he was involved, sometimes a short version (s), sometimes a long version (l). I looked at what candidates replied, and marked what I like. With Barkeep49, we had as interesting discussion. 12 candidates today and we found an image. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Kurdish civil engineer and politician
Hevrin Khalaf,
who worked for tolerance
among Christians, Arabs, and Kurds,
was killed
in the 2019 Turkish offensive into Syria?

I voted. As 12 candidates passed my minimum request I voted neutral for the one most likely to be elected without my vote. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Answers[edit]

Candidate nom day answer day answers remedy Precious no. Precious reason Experience G C sup Elected %
gadfium 3 Nov 3–9 Nov "would agree" open 2028 Māori task force admin Green tickY s Green tickY Yes
Richwales 3 Nov 4–11 Nov "partly agree" open 278 law and massacre admin s Green tickY
Worm That Turned 4 Nov 5 Nov support per vote in the case 2a,e 203 support arb Green tickY n Yes 75,94
Fish and karate (withdrawn 12 Nov) 6 Nov 7–11 Nov "partly agree" 1, 2b 1802 courage and images admin
Hawkeye7 6 Nov 7 Nov "follow GorillaWarfare" 171 people in sports and battles former admin l
Cas Liber 8 Nov 8 Nov "agree" 2e 75 wildflowers and birds former arb Green tickY s Green tickY Yes 78,43
Lord Roem (withdrawn 13 Nov) 8 Nov 8 Nov "agree" 2e 1736 supreme justice admin, arb clerk Green tickY
Thryduulf 9 Nov 9–10 Nov "disagree" 2c,d, or e 576 thinking of options arb n
Bradv 9 Nov 9–10 Nov "disagree", explained 2a or 2b, 2a 13 Nov 2263 "help improve the encyclopedia and achieve its vision" admin, arb clerk s Green tickY 62,55
Isarra 10 Nov 14 ask further n
Barkeep49 10 Nov 10–11 Nov "disagree" 2109 radiant child admin s Green tickY
Laser brain (withdrawn 16 Nov) 10 Nov 10 Nov "agree" 700 featured pet projects admin, FA coordinator Green tickY
KrakatoaKatie 11 Nov 11 Nov "disagree", as in the case 2b 1777 "one of the best Wikipedians of all time" arb n 70,07
Xeno 11 Nov 11 Nov "agree" 2181 clear thoughts and language bureaucrat Green tickY s Green tickY Yes 69,28
Newyorkbrad 11 Nov 11 Nov "agree" + respect other views 2a 99 standing strong arb with long standing Green tickY n Yes 79,69
The Rambling Man 11 Nov 11 Nov "agree" explained 2a 602 playing nice former admin Green tickY s Green tickY Yes
David Fuchs 11 Nov 11 Nov "agree" 153 star treks former arb Green tickY n Yes 66,10
Beeblebrox 11 Nov 11 Nov "agree" 553 "move along" former arb Green tickY 66,63
Llywrch 11 Nov 12 Nov "agree with sentiment" 2a 2308 places in Ethiopia, Roman senators, and butting in admin Green tickY n Yes
Maxim 12 Nov 12 Nov "agree" 2a sort of 1196 ice hockey players bureaucrat Green tickY n Yes 65,94
SoWhy 12 Nov 12 Nov "agree" 202 questions and help admin Green tickY n Yes 67,36
Kudpung 12 Nov 12 Nov "might follow WTT OR GW" admin n
Calidum 12 Nov 12 Nov "agree" but evidence 2a 1038 common sense Green tickY n Yes
DGG 12 Nov 13 Nov "agree" 453 keep articles admin Green tickY n Yes 63,25
Enterprisey 12 Nov 17 Nov ask further n


Results

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Template adapted from User:Worm That Turned/ACE2015