User:Friend505/Old IP talk page

July 2020

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that in this edit to Zhuang Zhou, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blablubbs (talk) 11:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

I would like you to restore my content now. This edit was made by the owner of the talk page, [removed because I do not want my IP address to be revealed]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Zhuang Zhou, you may be blocked from editing. Blablubbs (talk) 11:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 12:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reply

Hello. This is a reply to your message on my talk page as of this revision. Your edit was reverted because you removed content without adequate explanation. When reverting your edit, I provided an adequate edit summary and left a notice that assumed good faith on your talk page. In doing so, I used rollback no differently than one would use the "undo" button. Instead of resubmitting your edit with an adequate explanation, you simply undid my revision - again without leaving an edit summary. It is not the responsibility of other editors to inquire about your motivations. I also want to remind you that Wikipedia is not censored; we do not remove content simply because it conflicts with personal sensibilities of individual contributors. If there is no substantive reason (e.g. unreliable sourcing) to remove content, then it should not be removed. Finally, please refrain from leaving aggressive messages on my talk page; they seem especially out of place when you are accusing me of not assuming good faith. Thank you. Blablubbs (talk) 12:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Just in case you don't see it on your own talk page

Dear Blablubbs, What I mean is will you go to the admins and tell them to block me if I revert your change with an edit summary? I will change other things around it to make it more gramatically and temporally correct. Thanks for replying, [removed because I do not want my IP address to be revealed]