User talk:Crocadog

Welcome!

Hello, Crocadog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Vsmith 02:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your question on my talk page. Vsmith 02:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Green algae[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Green algae. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. KP Botany 00:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pleistocene[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Your contribution to the page Pleistocene has been determined to contain incorrect information. Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information about this. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 20:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rat[edit]

the first rats did in fact appear in the Early plestocene see the rat article for futher information.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Street Scholar, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk questions[edit]

Hi. Please read the notices at the top of the Help Desk page before posting more questions. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 02:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evowiki[edit]

Hi, I just deleted Evowiki since the previous AfD resulted in its deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EvoWiki (Second (?) nomination). If you have any reason to believe that the reasons given for deletion in that discussion are no longer current, I recommend that you either a) write a stub that adequately handles those issues or take the matter to deletion review (if one thinks that there is some other reason for overturning or has a less than clear cut case that the situation has changed). JoshuaZ 02:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I get it[edit]

I get the point, some little shit is vandalizing my page. What a freak. He has an obsession with my cock. --StreetScholar 19:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]