Template talk:Taxonomy/Amaranthaceae

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2020[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Chenopodiaceae 2001:8004:1380:F4A5:C02F:C363:9128:11F5 (talk) 02:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:49, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2020[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"change Amaranthaceae to Chenopodiaceae" Sdeonarayan (talk) 12:10, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2022[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This page has Chenopodium spinescens in the wrong family. I have changed it to Chenopodiaceae in the general information, but can someone please change in the taxonomic chart? Any Australian botanic garden webpage will confirm that the genus Chenopodium is in Chenopodiaceae (and not Amaranthaceae as currently in the Wikipedia article). See this webpage for example: https://vicflora.rbg.vic.gov.au/flora/taxon/d84a3ae4-6241-45c6-9d95-1bf645a9b42d Thanks! 2001:8003:95F2:A501:C118:D0DE:E7CA:F130 (talk) 11:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Your edit to Chenopodium spinescens was reverted by Gderrin, so procedurally declining this request. According to the Wikipedia articles in question, "Chenopodiaceae" and "Amaranthaceae" are two names for the same family. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]