This template is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Most people I know use STD as the abbreviation for Star Trek Discovery. I vote for it being listed as an alternate, or to replace it completely. Brian (talk) 17:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This list should be the official abbreviations, not whatever "most people [you] know use". It think, given the way certain people think about Discovery, it is obvious why "STD" is used by them and why that is not used officially. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, we should use 'LDS' instead of 'LDX', 'VGR' instead of 'VOY', and 'DSC' instead of 'DIS'. 'LDX' seems wholly a Wikipedia invention (Memory Alpha uses 'LD', which is also incorrect), and 'VOY' and 'DIS' are, rather than the actual production abbreviations, just what is commonly used by the fandom. 'SHO' also seems to be a Wikipedia invention; most other sources use 'ST', and I can't find an official production abbreviation for it. (may I add, I'm also against 'STD', just arguing for consistency) 2600:8801:C900:10B:B03F:65CD:3F4C:2BAE (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
