Template talk:Did you know/Jack Stewart (ice hockey)

Jack Stewart (ice hockey)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... that Hockey Hall of Fame defenceman "Black Jack" Stewart, considered the hardest hitter of his time, earned his nickname after an opponent said being hit by him felt like being struck with a blackjack?

5x expanded by Resolute (talk). Self nom at 03:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada's Oil Sands

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules – Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source – AGF on offline source. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest – Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable – None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed –

ALT1 ... that Hockey Hall of Fame defenceman "Black Jack" Stewart quipped that his stick was not for scoring, but for "breaking arms"?

Or something from that quote. Love it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Length – Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage – Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP) – Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality – Beautiful quotes. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing – This and this show no problems. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio (files) – Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting –

Comments/discussion:

I'd like some feedback from the nom on a possible ALT, but this one is pretty much good to go. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he actually said his stick was for "breaking arms", though I doubt he meant that literally as I haven't found any indication he was criticized for deliberately trying to injure opponents. I think using the alt proposal, ending with "...his stick was not for scoring, but for 'breaking arms'" would be more reflective of the quote, and perhaps more interesting? Reso lute 14:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. So ALT1 is okay too? I avoided saying that was its true purpose, just that he said it was. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say so. I put "breaking arms" in quotes though. Thanks for reviewing! Reso lute 14:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either ALT1 or the original are good to go, although I prefer the ALT. You're welcome, Resolute. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]