Template talk:Did you know/Gisborough Priory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gisborough Priory[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know, unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk)

The eastern gable wall of Gisborough Priory

5x expanded by Prioryman (talk). Self nom at 07:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Expansion - good; hook - would be nice to see it in the lead and cannot verify the offline source so will agf; I like the image. I checked this source and am confused. The source says the alum industry began in Queen Elizabeth's time, the article says it was the direct result of the dissolution, which Henry VIII caused. Maybe needs a little clarification. Also I think the information about the alum is interesting and bringing the "piss" to the area to make alum - suggest trying to incorporate into the hook. Otherwise fine. There's a huge variance in the quality of the writing and because one of the sources is not available online, want to think about this a bit. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 02:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please hold on re the alum industry section. I didn't write it - someone else added it - and I have some issues with it too; I'll rewrite it today. Prioryman (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've now revised the alum section. There is a genuine connection with the priory which is worth noting, but the way it was done in the article previously was not ideal. I've rewritten it and moved it within the article (it no longer has its own section). Prioryman (talk) 10:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All checks out for original hook. As it seems the alum came long after the end of the priory, on unidentified land it once owned somewhere, I really doubt that the section belongs in this article at all, so a hook based on that would not work for me. Moonraker (talk) 09:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]