Template:Did you know nominations/Wilkie v. Robbins
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 01:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Wilkie v. Robbins[edit]
- ... that the United States Supreme Court case Wilkie v. Robbins involved a land dispute over a dude ranch resort?
- Reviewed: Stephanie Hickey
Created/expanded by Lord Roem (talk). Self nom at 23:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Second paragraph in the background section needs to finish with a reference. Same for the initial paragraph in Ginsburg's dissent, which is short, and should be merged with another. Anyway, the length, date and copyright checks out, and the QPQ is done. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
-
- In that case,
good to go. Article is new enough and long enough, and I cannot find any copyright issues with the text in the article. The article is now fully sourced with reliable, verifiable sources. The hook is included in the article and is sourced, per DYK rules. The article prose is good and there is no promotional content in the text and no indication of a conflict of interest. No images have been inserted into the article other than the one in {{SCOTUSCase}}, which has a good rationale to be used in an article. Again, Good to go. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 00:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- In that case,
