Template:Did you know nominations/United States v. Vampire Nation
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 18:07, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
United States v. Vampire Nation[edit]
- ... that the United States vanquished Vampire Nation in a Pennsylvania courthouse?
- ALT1:... that Vampire Nation's conviction for software piracy was upheld on appeal?
- ALT2:... that in United States v. Vampire Nation, the Third Circuit held that criminal forfeiture is allowed for any offense punishable by civil forfeiture?
- Reviewed: Ram Chandra Datta
- Comment: This is for
Halloween consideration. The first two are more in-theme with the holiday; the third would be if we wanted a more straightforward one.
Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nominated at 03:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC).
Dates and lengths both good. Some close paraphrasing is present but his is not an issue due to technical nature of covered material and the original sources being in the public domain and properly cited (Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing#Public domain or free use content). With the article being created with over 16K of readable prose there are no size issues even if public domain text were to be completely removed. Can not fully verify article content due to a couple of the sources being off-line, so AGF. --Allen3 talk 15:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'll just pop in here and note that the initial hook is amazingly hilarious and is the obvious choice to use here. I, JethroBT drop me a line 17:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I came to this page from the post at WT:DYK, so I didn't see these previous reviews. Article is new enough, long enough, adequately referenced. I rewrote several instances of close paraphrasing and added more detail from source. QPQ done. Original hook ref is verified and is also, in my opinion, the best choice for the Halloween line-up. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
