Template:Did you know nominations/United States documents leak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Edge3 (talk) 15:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2022–2023 Pentagon document leaks
- ... that classified documents of the United States were partially leaked onto a Discord server for the video game Minecraft? Source: NBC News
- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ not needed.
Created by ElijahPepe (talk). Self-nominated at 00:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/United States documents leak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- @ElijahPepe: The refimprove tag needs to be resolved. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
ElijahPepe: What FormalDude said regarding maintenance templates. Otherwise, this is new enough and long enough. Hook short enough and sourced. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found. QPQ unnecessary. I'd like to see the maintenance template addressed before I approve this.--Launchballer 23:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
The nominator has not responded to the above review despite a ping last month and a recent talk page message. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)- Hi @FormalDude and Narutolovehinata5:. I've done some citation work on this article. Would you be willing to re-review this one? Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Forgot a ping: Launchballer. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Aside from the fact that this is no longer on T:TDYK anyway and would need to be readded, I note that there is still a tag on the article, in the Contents section. Possibly worth siphoning off?--Launchballer 10:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Launchballer. Thank you for your feedback. There's consensus against splitting on the talk page, so I went ahead and removed that. I also added it to T:TDYK just now. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Aside from the fact that this is no longer on T:TDYK anyway and would need to be readded, I note that there is still a tag on the article, in the Contents section. Possibly worth siphoning off?--Launchballer 10:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
