Template:Did you know nominations/Toothcomb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 11:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Toothcomb[edit]

The toothcomb of a lemur (viewed from above).

  • Reviewed: Melithaea ochracea
  • Comment: If you think the colugo toothcomb illustration would be better, feel free to add it and an alt hook. This topic is so bizarre for most people that we could probably make half a dozen hooks. – Maky « talk » 12:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Maky (talk). Self nom at 12:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

  • 5x expansion OK and in time, very nice looking article (and first time I've ever seen a GA here at DYK!). AGF on offline articles. Even though bush babies is linked to Galago, I'm a bit uneasy about using a term that isn't even mentioned in the article - if you're scanning the article and (like me) you don't already know that a galago is a bush baby, you wouldn't find the hook fact. Simon Burchell (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. The reason I used "bush babies" in the DYK hook is because more people are familiar with that term. In the article, the mentions are so few that it would only complicate the text... especially when the sources refer to them as galagos. Anyway, I've changed the hook to read "galagos". – Maky « talk » 18:48, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the change, and quick reply - the tweaked hook is fine. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 19:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)