Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas D. Keizur

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Thomas D. Keizur[edit]

(

)

... that in 1844, Thomas D. Keizur was elected captain of the Oregon Rangers militia company, the first military unit authorized and formed in the Oregon Country?

Source: In Carey’s General History of Oregon (p. 542) it says: "The incident (an Indian-settler gun fight that resulted in several deaths) … resulted in the organization of the mounted rifle company known as the Oregon Rangers, of which T. D. Keyser (Keizur) was captain, the officers being duly commissioned by the executive committee of the provisional government. This constituted the first military force ever authorized in the Oregon Country." In Gray’s A History of Oregon it says on p. 571 that the Oregon Rangers were formed on "1844—March 9th…" and then on p. 573 go on to say: "The article of compact allowed the company (the Oregon Rangers) to elect a captain … so the company proceeded, by nomination, to elect their officers, to wit: For captain T. D. Keizer (Keizur) ..." Note Keizur’s name is often misspelled in historic documents.

Reviewed: Washington Public Records Act

Created by Orygun (talk). Self-nominated at 06:07, 10 March 2018 (UTC).

Sources check out for hook. Article is in very good condition. Meanderingbartender (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

@Meanderingbartender: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. An optional Reviewer's Template is located above the edit window. Yoninah (talk) 23:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Meanderingbartender (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

@Meanderingbartender: Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)