Template:Did you know nominations/Tachikawa Sumito
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tachikawa Sumito
- ... that in a memorial tribute to Tachikawa Sumito, a former colleague said she did "not think there will ever be another [Japanese singer] to surpass him"? Source: 立川清登さんの思い出 [Memories of Mr. Tachikawa Sumito], p. 1
- ALT1: ... that in 1976, Tachikawa Sumito made a hit cover of a song he first discovered when a housewife called into his radio show requesting to hear a version of it? Source: 立川清登 [Tachikawa Sumito], p. 59; [1]
- ALT2: ... that Tachikawa Sumito became a household name in Japan thanks to his 1961 recording of "My Grandfather's Clock"? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Trinitatiskirche, Wolfenbüttel and Template:Did you know nominations/Gyōji
- Comment:
Created by CurryTime7-24 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 45 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.CurryTime7-24 (talk) 04:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC). CurryTime7-24 this nomination was not properly transcluded to WP:DYKN, which is why it has gone unreviewed. As the nomination was made during the unreviewed backlog mode, you need to provide two QPQs within the next week. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29 and Launchballer: Why two QPQs? I have enough QPQs that I would be willing to donate one, but not two. --evrik (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- See my 01:54, 14 My comment above evrik. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- "I'll take this one when I see two QPQs." Why did you say that? I'll donate the QPQ and review it now just to move it forward. --evrik (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Normally, when I do QPQs, I usually pick the oldest fully unreviewed nomination, as that's what WP:DYKRI encourages me to do ("It's a good idea to focus on reviewing older nominations that haven't received any attention yet.") On this occasion, with the QPQs overdue by more than a month, I wanted to be sure that CurryTime7-24 is in fact coming back, because if they aren't, then arguably a review for the next oldest would be more useful.--Launchballer 22:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- If I donate a QPQ will you do the review? --evrik (talk) 22:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will review this when I see two QPQs. That is what is required for this nom.--Launchballer 00:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- What is the "unreviewed backlog mode", and why are two QPQs required? --evrik (talk) 01:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- For nominations begun between 00:00, 8 March, and 23:59, 12 April 2024, articles were liable for an extra QPQ, as we had such a large backlog of unreviewed nominations that we were breaching the WP:PEIS limit.--Launchballer 01:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I donated two. Please link me to that discussion. --evrik (talk) 01:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Implemented at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 198#Backlog at WP:DYKN, left at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 198#Are we leaving backlog mode yet?.--Launchballer 02:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I donated two. Please link me to that discussion. --evrik (talk) 01:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- For nominations begun between 00:00, 8 March, and 23:59, 12 April 2024, articles were liable for an extra QPQ, as we had such a large backlog of unreviewed nominations that we were breaching the WP:PEIS limit.--Launchballer 01:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- What is the "unreviewed backlog mode", and why are two QPQs required? --evrik (talk) 01:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will review this when I see two QPQs. That is what is required for this nom.--Launchballer 00:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- If I donate a QPQ will you do the review? --evrik (talk) 22:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Normally, when I do QPQs, I usually pick the oldest fully unreviewed nomination, as that's what WP:DYKRI encourages me to do ("It's a good idea to focus on reviewing older nominations that haven't received any attention yet.") On this occasion, with the QPQs overdue by more than a month, I wanted to be sure that CurryTime7-24 is in fact coming back, because if they aren't, then arguably a review for the next oldest would be more useful.--Launchballer 22:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29 and Launchballer: Why two QPQs? I have enough QPQs that I would be willing to donate one, but not two. --evrik (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Long enough, new enough. Can't read a word of Japanese, so AGF on the hooks and on Earwig - though I don't find ALT0 or ALT2 interesting (people are always going to say nice things at a funeral, and famous musicians are always going to become famous for something). Lead's a bit short, though not quite short enough to deserve {{lead too short}}, and no other maintenance templates deserved. Let's roll.--Launchballer 02:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
