The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Overall: The article was new enough when nominated, is long enough (>220 characters), and otherwise complies. Its claims and quotations are cited to reputable published sources, and the online sources substantially validate the content. It treats its subject in a suitably neutral tone, not e.g. overselling his impact or musical legacy. The claims in the hook are specifically cited to online records of opera runs. The hook is otherwise interesting enough and long enough. Once there's a QPQ review, this one should be ready to run. This one now looks good to go! Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
The article was new enough when nominated, is long enough (>220 characters), and otherwise complies. Its claims and quotations are cited to reputable published sources, and the online sources substantially validate the content. It treats its subject in a suitably neutral tone, not e.g. overselling his impact or musical legacy. The claims in the hook are specifically cited to online records of opera runs. The hook is otherwise interesting enough and long enough.