Template:Did you know nominations/Spinophorosaurus
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Spinophorosaurus[edit]
Skeletal reconstruction of Spinophorosaurus
- ... that Spinophorosaurus had spikes on its tail, unlike most other sauropod dinosaurs? [1]
- ALT1:... that a tip from local Tuareg people led to the discovery of the dinosaur Spinophorosaurus and other fossils in Niger? [2]
5x expanded by FunkMonk (talk) and Jens Lallensack (talk). Nominated by FunkMonk (talk) at 12:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC).
FunkMonk Article is long enough and 5x expanded recently enough. No copyvio in the article and the image is licensed and sourced appropriately. I looked at the source for Alt0 (which I think is more interesting) and verified that it supports the fact that it had a spiked tail, but didn't see anything that supports the "unlike other members of its group" part of the hook. This also isn't explicitly stated in the article itself. It's also unclear what you mean by "group". If you could make that clearer in the article that would be nice. Such an interesting piece, though! Enwebb (talk) 20:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, it is a bit technical, but the spiked tail/osteoderms is listed under the "diagnosis", which is per definition a list of features that distinguish it from other relatives. I have added the line "a distinguishing feature of the genus". But I have another source that more explicitly states in layterms that it is unique for this animal, if needed. What if I say "unlike most of its relatives" or "unlike most related species" here instead? More alts might be coming up, by the way. FunkMonk (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that
"unlike most related species"
is an improvement to the current phrasing. Also I like the edit you made to the article itself. I'd pass it now for that hook, but I'll wait for your say-so in case you want to add more hook options. Enwebb (talk) 00:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)- Alternatively, we could write "... that Spinophorosaurus had spikes on its tail, unlike most other sauropods?". A good source stating that the feature is rare in sauropods is this: [3]. Jens Lallensack (talk) 06:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Nice, much more concise, we don't need to mention both "its group" and "sauropod", when it's the same... I think we might need to introduce Spino as "the dinosaur", though. Not everyone knows what a sauropod is. FunkMonk (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, what about "... that Spinophorosaurus had spikes on its tail, unlike most other sauropod dinosaurs?" Jens Lallensack (talk) 13:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Nice, much more concise, we don't need to mention both "its group" and "sauropod", when it's the same... I think we might need to introduce Spino as "the dinosaur", though. Not everyone knows what a sauropod is. FunkMonk (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Alternatively, we could write "... that Spinophorosaurus had spikes on its tail, unlike most other sauropods?". A good source stating that the feature is rare in sauropods is this: [3]. Jens Lallensack (talk) 06:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that
![[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Spinophorosaurus.png){kind=link}