Template:Did you know nominations/San Diego County Administration Center
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 19:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
San Diego County Administration Center[edit]
- ... that the San Diego County Administration Center (pictured) was dedicated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938 before a crowd of 25,000 people?
- ALT1: ... that the historic San Diego County Administration Center (pictured) was principally funded by the Works Progress Administration?
- Reviewed: The Indian Antiquary
Created by Keizers (talk). Nominated by MelanieN (talk) at 18:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC).
- The article is new enough, long enough, QPQ done, and either hook is fine, though I think the first is better. The image is fine. I am concerned, however, because there appears to be a lot of close paraphrasing in the article. For example: article: "It contains open grassy areas, a playground, shaded sitting areas, gardens, an interactive fountain and waterfront views.", source: "The space boasts large, open grassy areas, a playground, shaded sitting areas, gardens and an expansive interactive fountain."; article: "At the 1935 California Pacific International Exposition (World's Fair), plans for the building were hailed as a prototype of American civic center architecture.", source: "At the 1935 World’s Fair Exposition, plans for the San Diego City and County Administration Building were hailed as a prototype of American civic center architecture." There are other such instances of close paraphrasing or copying. Also, a few sentences do not have inline citations. Unless this is fixed, it doesn't meet DYK criteria. Thanks! MountainRail (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestions. Two of us have worked to improve the sourcing and make sure there is no close paraphrasing. I hope this passes muster now. --MelanieN (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Excellent, thanks for your work! I reworded a few additional sentences and added a few refs, but this article looks good to go now. Thanks! MountainRail (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestions. Two of us have worked to improve the sourcing and make sure there is no close paraphrasing. I hope this passes muster now. --MelanieN (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
