Template:Did you know nominations/Pixar Short Films Collection, Volume 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Pixar Short Films Collection, Volume 1[edit]

Created/expanded by Status (talk). Self nominated at 20:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC).

  • I will review this. Chris857 (talk) 17:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Non-free image is appropriately tagged and sized
  • Expanded from 649 characters to 3003 characters, only a 4.6x expansion. Is there more you can write to bring it up to 5x? Perhaps expand the lead, or add more about each individual short film? Or extra features?
  • Cited inline; the sources look OK. (Not really for DYK, but do you know if any books discuss this collection? They would be a good addition if they exist.)
  • QPQ satisfied
  • I will look for paraphrasing later. Chris857 (talk) 18:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. I have added another review of the collection, and I believe that it's now at a 5x expansion. Nothing really in Google Books about this collection; I did, however, find a book that talks about each short film, and does make a mention of the release. I'm still trying to figure out how and if how much to go into detail about each film. I'll try adding some more stuff now.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm doubtful of the reliability of 7M Pictures. SL93 (talk) 14:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

It is included on Rotten Tomatoes as a reliable reviewer.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 19:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
That is good enough for me. This is ready. SL93 (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)