Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Leopoldine of Austria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Maria Leopoldine of Austria's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC).

Maria Leopoldine of Austria[edit]

Empress Maria Leopoldine

5x expanded by Surtsicna (talk). Self nom at 17:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Long enough, but this is nowhere near a 5x expansion in five days. Even using the raw size 4536 bytes to 7680 bytes is a 1.7x expansion. Also tagged as a stub in the WikiProject templates on the talk page, but could be reassessed as Start Class at least. --Canley (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Actually, it's more than a 4.5× expansion. We go by prose size, not file size. (A tool such as DYKcheck is very helpful in determining this.) The prose went from 512 to 2338 characters, so 222 more would make a 5× expansion. I have only looked at the article's size, so if it's sufficiently expanded soon, someone will have to do a full review. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 11:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry for having been a bit sloppy here; the 300 characters I forgot about have been inserted as originally planned. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Surtsicna, I thought you might have left some content out! I did use DYKcheck which said it didn't qualify, but you're right Mandarax, it was close to 5x not 1.7x because I didn't DYKcheck the pre-expansion version, sorry. OK now, assuming good faith on the hook reference which is offline (and presumably in German?). --Canley (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
I've added another reference - still offline, but in English, for what it's worth! Thank you for your time. Surtsicna (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)