Template:Did you know nominations/Marcus Beck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Marcus Beck[edit]

Marcus Beck
Marcus Beck

Source: " http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014107688507801214"Source: " https://livesonline.rcseng.ac.uk/biogs/E000801b.htm"Beck witnessed the ravages of war and reported that French surgeons refused to adopt Lister's antiseptic method in the managementofwarwounds...... Beck became most widely known as the Editor of the 8th and 9th editions of Erichsen’s Science and Art of Surgery, which appeared respectively in 1884 and 1888....He most skilfully included recent advances in the science of surgery and surgical pathology, including the pathology of wounds and septic diseases. The researches of Pasteur and Koch with the work of Lister were thus made known to all students of surgery

  • ALT1... that Marcus Beck was one of the first surgeons in London in the 19th century to adopt Joseph Lister's techniques of antiseptic surgery?

Source: "https://livesonline.rcseng.ac.uk/biogs/E000500b.htm" Source: "https://livesonline.rcseng.ac.uk/biogs/E000801b.htm" Source: "http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014107688507801214 In London, except .... Marcus Beck at University College Hospital, Lister’s methods were but little understood or practised...Beck entered the University of Glasgow in 1860, where Joseph Lister, his first cousin once removed....Beck became one of Lister's stoutest defenders during the controversy over the introduction of the antiseptic technique in surgery ...

  • Reviewed: Not required

Created by Whispyhistory (talk). Self-nominated, moved from draft 12 November 2017.

  • Simplified both the hooks as discussed with nom. (not reviewing). Philafrenzy (talk) 08:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough. Either of the two hooks could be used, I have tweaked ALT1 to better reflect the facts. The image is appropriately licensed and the article is neutral. "Earwig" brought up a 64% chance of copyright violation. Most of the highlighted phrases are proper names and are acceptable, but if you look at the "Surgical career" section you will see its structure is a bit close to the source, although as you needed to keep the information chronological, I thought it was just about acceptable. No QPQ needed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Reworded some of surgical career. I prefer the first hook but either is good. Thank you @Cwmhiraeth: Whispyhistory (talk) 09:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Confirming tick for the original hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)