Template:Did you know nominations/List of Prime Ministers of India

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of India

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that other than being India's second longest serving prime minister, Indira Gandhi (pictured) is also the world's second longest serving female prime minister?

Created/expanded by TheSpecialUser (talk). Self nom at 07:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

• My reveiw. Article: 1.It was a much more than 5-fold expansion in the lede section. 2. There were about 2000 characters in the lede on the nomination date. It seems neutral and well cited, though I didn't check all the soruces for close paraphrasing. Hook: 1. Is 137 characters. 2. The hook is very interesting and well sourced. Other: The image in fine. My only concerns: Why is there no Quid pro quo (a review of another article)? Also some of the grammar seems clunky to me, but that could be a Indian English thing. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 22:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

• Summary of above: QPQ required, copyedit for grammar needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

• Issues unaddressed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

• Sorry. My real life doesn't allow me to get active on Wikipedia. However, I've done the grammar tweaks that were suggested by Kevlar on my talk page and have reviewed an DYK: Template:Did you know nominations/Sri Lankan cricket team in India in 1997–98. Is there anything else for me to do? Thanks for all your time. — TheSpecialUser ^(talkpage) _{(contributions)}  03:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

• Rereview needed — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Article reads OK, fact checks out, QPQ now done. --Errant ^(chat!) 20:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)