Template:Did you know nominations/Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve
- ... that the Selangor State Executive Council degazetted most of the Kuala Langat North Forest Reserve, despite the Legislative Assembly having unanimously voted to preserve it? Source: [1]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hockley Pendant
- Comment: Hook wording tweaks welcome!
Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Self-nominated at 15:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC).
- Hi, I'm going to do a QPQ on this article. dawnleelynn(talk) 19:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC) *
- Hi, I believe you need to do your QPQ too? Or do you have a free one. How do I check? dawnleelynn(talk) 20:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
- Hi dawnleelynn, the QPQ is above: "Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hockley Pendant". As a side note please notify on the talkpage when there is a review needing attention, I almost missed this on the watchlist! CMD (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Chipmunkdavis. Yes, I knew in the beginning there was a QPQ; I can't say why I got confused. Also knew I should have left a talk page message. I think I'm trying to juggle too much. Sorry about that! Sorry for changing cancelled too. I don't usually work in articles that have other language considerations, but I'm trying to do the older DYKs that have been waiting longer. Also, please don't change the template youself. Thanks! dawnleelynn(talk) 03:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Chipmunkdavis Hi again, this QPQ has passed. Great hook, impeccable sources, lovely prose, just great job all around! A pleasure to review. dawnleelynn(talk) 03:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. Which template did I change? CMD (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Chipmunkdavis The template used to review the QPQ. I don't recall changing it but I must have. Nevermind. Hopefully, I'll get better at QPQs again. Thanks for your patience. I'm still happy to get this done in a short amount of time. 14:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)dawnleelynn(talk)