Template:Did you know nominations/Giovan Giacomo Paleari Fratino

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Giovan Giacomo Paleari Fratino[edit]

Torra di Mortella

Created/expanded by Aymatth2 (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 22:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • New: Good. Length: More than 4000 chars. Policy: There seems to be some close paraphrasing of the Vigano sourse. Nominator needs to perform some editing to make the article more distinct from its sources. Abyssal (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Looks good, I guess. Abyssal (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm a bit concerned that some closeness to source structure still remains, for example to this source. I'm also seeing a couple of factual errors: for example, you say that Pamplona was almost a pentagon, but your source says it was almost a hexagon. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I made some copyedits to clarify the wording in the section on Gibraltar, but did not change the structure, which seems fairly natural - basically chronological. What is the concern here? I fixed the Pamplona polygon problem. What is the other factual error? Aymatth2 (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • The bit about "Philip II's chief engineer Tibúrcio Spannocchi refused to stop work on the zigzag wall" - the source says he refused to allow it to be destroyed, and that it was later completed, but doesn't connect the two in that way. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I have tweaked the wording. Think it is fixed now. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Okay, that's probably good enough, then. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)