Template:Did you know nominations/Ellen Zitek
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ellen Zitek[edit]
- ... that actress Georgina Bouzova feared that people would spit at her because of the behaviour of her on-screen counterpart Ellen Zitek?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Polly Paaaina
- Comment: Hook source requires a Highbeam account - exact quote if it need be a AGF: "I thought I would have people spitting at me in the streets because Ellen can be such a scheming, nasty character, but I haven't had anything like that." - [1]
Created by Raintheone (talk). Self-nominated at 15:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC).
Thank you for the work on this interesting article. The article is new enough and long enough, and there are no detected copyright violations. The hook is interesting, short enough, and sourced. I would only suggest a minor modification. ALT1: "... that actress Georgina Bouzova feared that people would spit at her because of the behaviour of her character Ellen Zitek?" To me, an on-screen counterpart is a co-star, not a character. If this tweak is okay, I think we should be good to go. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Review needed for the proposed ALT1 above. North America1000 10:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)- @Northamerica1000:It is almost the same hook? The editor changed "on-screen counterpart" to "character" for clarity.Rain the 1 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- As long as the slash mark sign is there atop, it's typically unlikely that a reviewer will promote this. Hence the review needed notice above. I'm just trying to help things along. North America1000 03:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Just to clarify - does my ALT1 suggestion prevent me from approving this? We are good to go with ALT1 as far as I'm concerned, and I didn't want to ignore this thread if someone was waiting on a response from me. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but upon taking a closer look, the sentence in the article stating content of the hook does not have an inline citation to a reliable source at the end of the sentence. See WP:DYKRULES #3b, which explains this requirement. North America1000 03:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Good catch. Added it to the end of that sentence rather than just at the end of the next one. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Assuming no issue with me finishing this review, ALT1 is good to go. The entry is long enough, was new enough at the time of nomination, and is within policy as described in the DYK rules (no copyvio, article sourcing is good). The hook is sourced at the end of the sentence, is interesting and is not too long. QPQ done. EricEnfermero (Talk) 16:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
