Template:Did you know nominations/Diplomatic correspondence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Diplomatic correspondence[edit]

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Espectro I
  • Comment: Note that this article was discovered in a severely dilapidated state and is a work in progerss. I still need to locate sources to fill out references in a couple of the new sections we've added (e.g. "paper size"). This article is far from ready for a GAN review but should pass DYK easily. I have selected a hook that is correctly cited (though the source is, unfortunately, a specialty text that is not available online).

5x expanded by LavaBaron (talk) and Neutrality (talk). Nominated by LavaBaron (talk) at 09:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC).

  • It looks good, but I think at some point we'll need to replace the generic Satow's cite (which covers 21 pages: pp. 45–66) with more specific individual cites to the particular page/section numbers for each cite. Neutralitytalk 13:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Definitely, and good point. I can plan on working on that. LavaBaron (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Date and expansion fine. AGF on offline source. QPQ done, no close para. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)