Template:Did you know nominations/Caterpillar inflation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 06:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Caterpillar inflation[edit]

Created by Geni (talk). Self-nominated at 03:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC).

  • Article is new and long enough. It is neutral, uses inline citations and I cannot see any copyright violations. The hook is good, and cited with an offline source (I managed to find the relevant passage online though). QPQ has been done. I will never look at a preserved caterpillar in the same way again. :) - JuneGloom07 Talk 12:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I was asked to try and provide an April Fools hook for this nomination, so here is one possibility:
  • ALT2: ... that caterpillar inflation is a gut-wrenching process? Gatoclass (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
  • How about process rather than spectacle?©Geni (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Geni, because the caterpillar ends up being a spectacle, ie a specimen to look at. Gatoclass (talk) 03:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
But if you think that's too opaque, we could go with "process" I guess. Gatoclass (talk) 03:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The article is more about the process than the end result.©Geni (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I changed it to "process". On reflection, I don't think "spectacle" works the way it was intended anyway. Gatoclass (talk) 08:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Approving ALT2, striking the other hooks and replacing JuneGloom07's tick. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)