Talk:Zombie Prom

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 28 February 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NDelga425.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Allegory?[edit]

"The storyline of the ostracism of zombies is meant as an allegory for anti-gay discrimination."

Can this statement be substantiated a bit? I see the allegory for general tolerance to minority and marginized groups but what is specifically an allegory against anti-gay discrimination in the original play (of course the casting of RuPaul later added this element to the film)? --K Lady112 06:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. For now, I've added a [citation needed] tag - if the argument isn't fleshed out in the relatively near future, I propose we just remove the offending line. Labashier 01:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Reviews[edit]

The London Reviews section does not seem to be neutral. It just has a list of positive quotes on it. It is written to much like an advertisement.--JDDJS (talk) 20:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zombie Prom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060504124603/http://filmthreat.com:80/index.php?section=reviews&Id=8940 to http://www.filmthreat.com/index.php?section=reviews&Id=8940
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.danaprowe.com/blog/zombie-prom/Zombie

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Team[edit]

I noticed that information about the musicals original creative team is absent from the introduction, as is commonly present in articles about musicals. I found a BroadwayWorld link that detailed the original production team and would like to include the composer and lyricists names in the introduction. https://www.broadwayworld.com/shows/creative.php?showid=311620#contentstart --NDelga425 11:14, 20 February, 2019 (MST)

Musical Numbers[edit]

This section claims that the song "Jonny Don't Go" is incredibly similar to the song "Leader of the Pack" without providing any sort of source for the claim. Even if the songs sound somewhat alike (which is debatable) I don't think there's any reason for it to be mentioned here unless some outside source makes this important to note. I think removing this claim would be a good idea. -- NDelga425 12:58, 22 February, 2019 (MST)

As it stands this section is just a wall of text, so I'm going to clean it up a little by separating the numbers by act and numbering them. This is more of a cosmetic change but it should help clean it up. -- NDelga425 5:19, 22 February, 2019 (MST)

Critical Reception[edit]

I think it's nice to include some information about what critics thought of (and perhaps currently think of) the show. I found a few reviews from the 1996 production that I think would be nice to add. -- NDelga425 4:00, 23 February, 2019 (MST)

Adaptation[edit]

I'd like to combine the sections on the 2006 short film and the proposed feature film under one sections called "adaptations". I think this would help clean the page up a bit more. -- NDelga425 4:57, 23 February, 2019 —Preceding undated comment added 23:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]