Talk:Yung Joc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Track" or "Trap"?[edit]

Just curious, does he say meet me at tha track or trap in that song? -- Carlos 20:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He said TRAP 68.220.108.227 21:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What is tha Trap? (We from tha Bay, not tha south, sorry for dumb question) -- Carlos 04:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Trap is slang for the location where drugs, primarily cocaine, are sold, its not a dumb question at all. 68.220.108.227 21:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


NPOV[edit]

I removed the following line on grounds of NPOV...if someone wants to re-add it with neutral wording be my guest

Yung Joc "claims" to have created a dance called "Joc In," but if you watch Cassidy's Im a Hustla video he was doing the dance before Joc was getting wiped by Diddy. Leave it to Bad Boy Records to take credit for something sombody else created.Penguincube 15:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed some content[edit]

I removed the "facts" from the trivia section. They were irrelevant and biased. If the writer of these "facts" would like to re-word them, then please do so. J Dogg 21:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed opinionated views of Yung Joc from the 'Early Success'. Gamefaq's boards is not a good source... Rescorbic 19:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To whomever[edit]

To whomever wrote in the comment about how Yung Joc looks at the camera as he is departing from his videos and how it is annoying to some people, should refrain from writing such comments as they are only his/her opinions and have no real point in this article. I removed this comment because it cannot be substantiated. If the writer of these comments would like to contact me and discuss why I deleted their comments, please feel free to. J Dogg 00:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unreferenced information[edit]

On October 27th he was in a car wreck in New York and currently in critical condition.

I cannot find any verification for this fact, so I removed it from the article. – Heaven's Wrath   Talk  01:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Young Jeezy and Yung Joc are not related.[edit]

This is to the person who wrote that Yung Joc and Young Jeezy are related. In an interview with BET, Joc stated that he was not related to Jeezy. The website provided by the user who claims that they are cousins is not nearly as reliable as BET. If you want to read it yourself then go to [1]. To the user who added the false information on Yung Joc: "please stop adding false information." J Dogg 21:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, don't put false information people, For the past 3 months (thanks to the idiot who put Yung joc is related to Young Jeezy) I've been telling people that. Learn to do more proper research, they teach you this stuff in high school you know! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.96.84.18 (talk) 19:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Someone please take out the vandalism shown.

Removing "Yung Joc being a fugitive from the law" is not vandalism. It was a simple fact based on the timing of his actions. Skipping an arraignment is a felony. Yung Joc skipped a hearing, for whatever reasons, and was considered a fugitive from the law, until he surrendered to authorities. He is lucky that the judge accepted his "excuse". So chill out. How about one day before those articles you posted? That is what everyone who edited the page was going on.

http://allhiphop.com/stories/news/archive/2007/12/26/19051046.aspx

or

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=4052320&page=1

The whole purpose of Wikipedia is that you can edit and remove material day-to-day. Based on the day when his page was edited, he was considered a fugitive. It was not vandalism to place such material on his page since there were several sources backing that up. Several days later when the Judge did not punish him further is a new development which cancels out the old news. Think before you call someone an idiot.

Learn to use Google News or learn to read and learn the law. He is not a felon because some idiot on Wikipedia says he is. The judge accepted his excuse for being late and did not even raise his bail. I don't like his type of music as much as anyone, but even idiot rappers deserve the same legal treatment as anyone.

http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-12-27-yung-joc_N.htm

or

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7009557421


"Stanley Jackson Jr., his attorney, argues the rapper was out of town attending to personal financial and family obligations. Municipal Judge Michael John Ryan decided not to put Robinson in jail when he finally showed up. He set up a preliminary date of January 25 for the hearing. Robinson's bond of $100,000 was also reduced to $50,000."(the orignal bail)Undog (talk) 03:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia say: He faces local and federal charges. but "local" is not a good word for "state" since local goes more with county, city laws, and correct me if I am wrong, but the news reports I looked at all say something like:

In addition to the state charge, the 27-year-old rapper could face federal charges under the Air Piracy Act.

but NOT that he is facing federal charges.

He COULD be a felon if he is convicted but not just for his plane being late and he COULD face Federal Charges and he COULD die tomorrow (don't let this be one of the times where he does die and someone looks it up on wikipedia for the idiot, me who predicted it) but NONE of these things have happened yet Undog (talk) 03:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is still there.[edit]

That's some crazy and obvious vandalism. Someone should revert it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brian951378246 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

By the way, to whoever did it, it's hilarious! Brian951378246 04:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreed. Not funny.

Musicians[edit]

Yung Joc Is awesome Monty Zoo (talk) 04:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yung Joc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yung_Joc&oldid=1200360918"