Talk:Your Love (Nicki Minaj song)/GA3

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 14:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :)!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 20:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

First comments[edit]

Lead

"however when the song" >> "but when the song"

Done

I think that the information about the remixes doesn't belong to the background section. That paragraph goes better on composition.

Nothing else by now.

Done

—Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 20:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add. comments

I changed the picture of Lennox. I hope you don't mind.
The rest of the article seems to be in good shape. I'll be checking the references late.

—Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 21:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, great!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More comments[edit]

Lead

Billboard Hot 100 should be wikilinked, since its the 1st time you mention it.
Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs, the same as above.

Done

Background

"After being mixed differently and rewriting some of the lyrics", confusing tense. Better if wrote: "and some lyrics rewritten,"

Done

Ok, those are the last i see as prose. I'll check the refs. —Hahc 21 16:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

It's not necessary, but the Ref No.9, Entertainment Weekly, should be formatted with {{cite news}} ot {{cite journal}} for better order. But i repeat, is not necessary.
All fine. Checked.

—Hahc 21 17:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright perfect! How much stuff left to go?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 17:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing else =). —Hahc 21 17:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

—Hahc 21 17:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.