This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
General comments – Initially I was ready to encourage you to expand the article to include more detailed discussions of the experiments that led to the development of this alloy, how the alloy is fabricated, the mechanical properties (and other properties) of the alloy and why those properties are desirable in the given applications, and the specifics of the heat treating–age hardening relationship (even though there's a separate article that discusses it generally). I think those things are ultimately necessary, but why not merge this article and Hiduminium, etc., into an Aluminium–nickel alloy article? Let's discuss this before I give a detailed review. Two Hearted River(paddle / fish) 20:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That is a monstrously bad suggestion. I've withdrawn the nomination, if being a "good article" means making such changes. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
