Talk:Xmove

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category Terminal multiplexers[edit]

The ability to detach a display isn't what is meant by a terminal multiplexer in GNU screen - it's the sharing of a single terminal connection by several processes (which is a distinction for text-applications, but is taken for granted with X servers). Outside of the existing examples of GNU screen and similar text-applications, terminal multiplexing has a completely different meaning, which is unrelated to this or screen. Tedickey (talk) 23:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

/* Notability tag */[edit]

This source points out that it's been cited in 40 places. TEDickey (talk) 22:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A paper about something being cited X times does not necessarily make the something notable in wikipedia terms. See WP:GNG for the wikipedia definition of notability. Ideally, widely-read and/or mass-market coverage which directly addresses the topic. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read the source before making comments TEDickey (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference links broken[edit]

I fixed the third. Can anyone replace the first two? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.100.93.41 (talk) 02:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xmove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040808185651/http://markballew.com:80/projects/xmove/ to http://markballew.com/projects/xmove/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]