Talk:Work method statement

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Work method statement is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal to merge articles[edit]

I propose that Safe Work Procedure be merged into Work method statement. I think that the content in the Safe Work Procedure article relates to the same process as described in the Work Method Statement article. I work in the construction industry and i am familiar with the work method statement/Safe Work Procedure process. There are several terminologies used for this process and they can all be referenced in the remaining article with redirects in place on the deleted article name. Geez-oz (talk) 05:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer that they stay as is - the difference may be slight, but one is a document and one is a procedure - i just googled method statement, i was only interested in finding out what that was, no interest in what it was used for, only what it was - Alan Crean Ireland — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.255.179 (talk) 09:20, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should stay as it is - the two are completely different here in the UK, the slant toward Australia on this page may also cause confusion. The same terminology is used in the UK and Ireland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.53.146 (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted the comments and merge templates now removed Geez-oz (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC) QuickiWiki Look Up[reply]