Talk:Woodruff-Riter-Stewart Home

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Ad[edit]

I agree that the picture is not bad, but... What does the external link add to the article? To give us contact information for the bed and breakfast? Why was that person "noted"? Who is the architect? Is this article an advertisement? --Michaël 00:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not meant to be an ad. It's just one of the houses in Salt Lake that has a history and looks interesting. I took the picture and User:Cool Hand Luke knew enough about it to make an article for it. And the external link, well, it is a way to spend time at that place, so I don't see anything wrong with it, really. BigBen212 05:30, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks --Michaël 09:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]