Talk:William Stukeley

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 7, 2020 and November 7, 2022.

Freemasonry[edit]

Stukeley's diary clearly states that he was made a mason in January 1721, before Montagu's installation. The Grand Master was a commoner, there is no commentary on numbers, and (obviously) there is no commentary on future events. The two statements about lodge numbers and later developments in Grand Lodge would be useful if referenced. Does anybody know where these quotes came from? Fiddlersmouth (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly my foot[edit]

The article currently reads Stukeley

...incorrectly believed that the prehistoric megalithic monuments were a part of the druidic religion

which besides being unsourced is almost certainly a WP:LIE. It is undoubtably true that they were erected well before the people the Romans identified as druids were hanging around, but there's absolutely no way of establishing that the druids didn't consider themselves the continuation of a faith handed down by the original monolith builders; no way—short of archaeological digs establishing that absolutely no one visited the site for centuries during the Roman period—of establishing that they actually weren't; and no way of establishing that they weren't repurposed by the druids in some other fashion regardless of their original founders' intent. Removed pending clarification of some point he certainly got wrong (believing them to have been constructed c. 1st century BC, for instance). — $Llywelyn II$ 04:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit: ...were created as part of the 1st-millennium BC druidic religion... seems to have been what they meant, but the 4th century BC dating could use a source and there's no real reason it needs to go in the lead. Should kind of go without saying that the very first people to look at Stonehenge critically but without any modern dating techniques would make mistakes.] — $Llywelyn II$ 09:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bertram[edit]

Stukeley's involvement with Charles Bertram's forgery needs mentioning. — $Llywelyn II$ 09:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Stukeley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111201004813/http://www.plesiosaur.com/database/references/stukely/stukely1719.pdf to http://www.plesiosaur.com/database/references/stukely/stukely1719.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]