Talk:Westport River

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Comments[edit]

This is one of the poorest articles of more than 100 words in all of Wikipedia. Surely, someone with some writing skills and good judgment (not just "local knowledge", an irresistible passion for boating safety, and a compulsion to provide free advertising for his pals) can improve this thing. As it is, it's a complete joke. PeterHuntington (talk) 06:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But it has the most information on the river. So if it offends you delete it. Better yet remove any other matter which offends you. The local knowledge is important to boaters. I'd hate to see this site get sued because of deleted material due some purist point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willy Wonka (talk • contribs) 05:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Willy Wonka has added the problematic material in again. The problems are that the material added is advertising for non-notable local businesses as well as being a boating guide. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia article. What we currently have falls well short. -- Whpq (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]