Talk:Weatherill ministry

Bits and pieces

FYI, this article and Cabinet of South Australia can co-exist just as they do federally, and in QLD. Also, Cabinet of South Australia can now be and is linked in the template. Also, this article seems to have some issues. First off, personally I think current should be at the top instead of at the bottom. And the current list at the bottom has changes, ie: (until 27 May 2014) etc. The list should be current, without clarification or history. Is it an attempt to get it kinda-current without having to create a new table? Or now that we have Cabinet of South Australia with just a current list only, the need for a fix has drifted away as each article has their own purpose? Timeshift (talk) 16:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

I have no problem with them coexisting if that's the case in other places, as long as someone is willing to update the Cabinet page. I think, as you said at the end, it is useful to both have a current list and a list documenting the life of the current ministry. i'm not a fan of reverse-chronological order, as in other places we've had this discussion, and I don't think there's any way to avoid denoting minor changes in that format short of having an entirely new list every time a minor change is made to the ministry (e.g. the last one, which affected nobody but Maher, Rankine, Close and Hunter, or the one before which only affected Hamilton-Smith and Close, and incredibly minor changes to Koutsantonis and Snelling). That would lead to a massively long article and I don't think it serves any purpose. The Drover's Wife (talk) 17:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Weatherill Ministry. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/Members/Ministers/Pages/Ministers.aspx
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/Members/Ministers/Pages/Ministers.aspx
• Attempted to fix sourcing for https://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/Members/Ministers/Pages/Ministers.aspx
• Attempted to fix sourcing for https://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/Members/Ministers/Pages/Ministers.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)