Talk:Wang Lixiong

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Xinjiang[edit]

While Wang Lixiong's Tibet writings fall broadly into the intellectual circlejerk of regurgitated Western hegemonic views sexily repackaged as "Chinese dissent" for Western sinologues, his views on Xinjiang are much more thoughtful and nuanced in a way that this article does not express.

The article by Wang, "新疆独立是新疆继续分裂的开始", considers the fate of the non-Uygur majority in Xinjiang, should that region becomes independent as a "Uygurstan". He forecasts that the Kazaks in Yili, the Mongols of Bazhou, the Hui of Changji - all of whom have a state-sanctioned ethnoterritorial inheritance - and of course the well-armed Han in Shehezi, Dihua, etc. would fight their Uygur oppressors to the teeth.

With state intervention and volunteer kinship militae pouring in from Mongolia, Kazakhstan, and China, he continues, the separatists only have a chance in Kashi, Hetian, and Gumo. Whether in terms of economic resources (oil and cotton), materiel, or geostrategic advantage, these Uygur strongholds are not very significant. His conclusion, of course, is that independence is not a good idea. This article should make some indication of this unconventional "dissent", perhaps in reference to English-language reviews of "我的西域; 你的东土", which touch on the same ideas. Shrigley (talk) 20:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]