Talk:Vorbis comment

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[endianness##Big-endian|big-endian]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

AudioGrail[edit]

82.240.189.110, is there something notable about AudioGrail? It looks to be Yet Another Tag Editor. Unless it does something unique and specific to Ogg Vorbis comments, we either need a much larger list in a separate article, or we should remove it entirely. piman 19:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Change of article title[edit]

Should the title of this article not be VorbisComment rather than Vorbis comment? The former is used on the Xiph.Org wiki, as seen here. 151.226.52.75 (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TRACKTOTAL is also a de facto standard[edit]

TRACKTOTAL is also a de facto standard, as seen in ABCDE source code:

   # TRACKTOTAL is not in the proposed, minimal list of standard field names from
   # xiph.org: https://www.xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html but is in common usage
   # and read by mediainfo, ffprobe, vlc, Aqualung, ogg123, Foobar. And now abcde :)
   # The tag is quietly ignored by Audacious, MPlayer, mpv, XMMS....

That's why I added it in the de facto list in the article (but it got reverted).

Creak (talk) 14:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]