This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Wikipedia is not meant to be an indiscriminate collection. We normally limit filmography listings to major films we have articles on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's not completely accurate, and you mistake a film not having an article making it mean that film is not notable. Virtually every film you are deleting passes notability criteria. As per either WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Also, these are not indiscriminate listings. These are very discriminate listings, supported by citations. And you state it's "general policy"... could you please link to the policy you are referring to? Other than that, this seems to be a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Onel5969TT me 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
