Talk:Victoria Gillick
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled[edit]
I'm a newbie, so I don't know best how to address this issue, but:
- The Telegraph article cited is from 2000, not 2002 - this is a bug that needs fixing
- There is a article from December 2002 at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2569063.stm which says that Victoria Gillick *won* damages, and is not covered.
...so something is wrong with the presented timeline Alecmuffett (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC).